Is mywot.com Safe?

Die Seite ist die Seite eines politischen Magazins.Dieses Magazin macht von der Meinungsfreiheit gebrauch, man kann natürlich anderer Ansicht sein, aber das heißt nicht, dass die Seite nicht, dass die Seite nicht vertrauenswürdig sei.Die, die die schlechten Bewertungen abgegeben haben sind wohl nur wieder ein paar Linksradikale, die alle anderen Ansichten zum schweigen bringen wollen.

Отличный сайт для заработка. Автовыплаты. По этому проблем с получением заработанных денег нет. Админ старается вывести сайт в число лучших. Это видно по работе проекта. В общем комфортная и приятная обстановка как для рекламодателя , так и для пользователей. Таким ресурсам от чистого сердца хочется пожелать удачи.

I bought two life-size dolls from this site. They use paypal as payment and paypal is secured. I trust this website because I have been buying from them without any problems. The rate of NoScams below has little evidence as they do transactions via paypal and have not seen any virus or malware injected on my computer. I should not be typing this if my computer is already have viruses on it.

.....Уважаемые !!!!!!!!***не дурите ***никакой брокер))))) не хочет видеть Вас  в прибыли(обещание-- о ***несметных ,постоянных доходах_____-----смешной **миф*))))),можно вложить 250$////затем 1000,(потом все ж придем к----* 0*)важно что бы Вы были в *игре**.....)))))НЕ могу советовать......!)

Generally, WOT is an excellent guide to the trustworthiness of websites and I rely upon the comments of other WOT users as a guide before going to a website. N.B. WOT ratings are, for myself and other members of WOT, a guide and although immensely helpful most of the time are not always accurate: This is due to what is called the compensated-review process. It's quite simply when businesses and websites pay to create dummy accounts to not only purchase products but to write raving reviews, like the 4 and 5-star reviews one may often see on Amazon.    There are unfortunately many people with vested interests in voting as "trustworthy" a website which is illegal, has third-party links to adware and malware, and/or involve phishing and spam, who will give these websites a good rating on WOT, a practice WOT users need to be on guard against. A good method, besides using one's own discrimination and common sense, is to have a look at websites which are voted as "trustworthy" often with short but glowing comments by "users" and yet have quite a number of other WOT users warning about the websites and giving CONCRETE examples, backed up by accompanying data, as to exactly what is suspicious about the site(s): when one sees websites with precise information as to why they are untrustworthy, these should be taken 'on board' as websites which are NOT to be trusted.  When you find this mix of positive and negative comments, the website involved is almost always one to avoid and/or be wary of.  Watch out for a mixture of oppositional ratings with websites that you're not familiar with or am suspicious of, and you'll be smart to take the negative ratings much more seriously than the positive ones. This is the trouble one runs into when relying on people giving their opinions. Many will be biased with vested interests in websites e.g., often they're making money from them. It would be ideal if WOT could come up with a way to verify exactly who the raters were and to check their behaviour when it comes to rating websites highly that are known to be unethical, if not also illegal, and thus remove the biased raters from being able to continue to comment and rate websites for a set period of time or perhaps indefinitely if, after being allowed back on WOT, they resume the same habits again.