Protect yourself
from bad websites
Award winning security extension for your browser
(100% Free. No in-app payments or subscriptions)
7,000+ reviews  in Google Chrome
1,200,000+ users  have installed WOT and are browsing safely
Detect phishing scams and malware
Know which internet shops you can trust
Rate websites!
Help clean the internet

Is naturalnews.com safe? Reviews & Ratings

Do you own this site?Click here

Protect yourself from harmful sitesAdd WOT

Share your feedback about naturalnews.com

naturalnews.comreviews 1779
NewestOldestPopular

Promoter of disproved quackery such as homeopathy.

9
6
Social ResponsibilityFri Jan 16 1970

Only endorses 'alternative' medicine. Is anti scientifically proven medicine. Anti-vaccination and promotes medical practitioners who have had their medical licences revoked by respectable registration boards.

9
5

Love this site! Transformed my life!! 🙂

8
18

This site promotes nearly all known health scams. If it relates to your health and the evidence indicates that the treatment or product does not work then this site will promote it.

8
4

Great assortment of information. Well organized.

7
17
DanZ_in_TNFri Jan 16 1970

JavaScript web bugs for 6 tracking/advertising companies (per NoScript).
See http://w2.eff.org/Privacy/Marketing/web_bug.html

7
2

Worth reading, we need debate. Many articles with good references to research. Beware of the bloggers who are targeting health sites, beware also of all the false claims that are being made on your tv every time the adverts come on. Observe fo ryourself what improves your health and evaluate for yourself from a point of intelligence.

7
13
nickcool9999Fri Jan 16 1970

Produces Media Mass panic http://www.naturalnews.com/aspartame.html

7
3
DianneSousaFri Jan 16 1970

I would add as well that the quality of the information on this site is so low, that it's not even questionable. It's plain wrong and is therefore utterly useless. Mike Adams would rather have parents choose whatever medical treatment they want for their children, rather then respect children's rights to appropriate, science-based medical care. Anyone who is involved with this site or does not condemn it is complicit is the neglect and harm of children.

7
4
JustinthetwitThu Jan 15 1970

Great site, and they DO know what they're talking about, just so you know.

6
14

Safety Rating Breakdown

Categories

Misleading or unethicalAlternative medicineOpinions, religion, politicsScamSuspicious

Trustworthiness

56 / 100

Child Safety

59 / 100