piltdownsuperman.com é seguro?

The first comment is based on the issue of critical thinking, and condescention; which is then used as the ONLY reason to suggest this site is unsuitable for children. IN fact, this site is GREAT for children, for it breaks the censorship against scientific inquiry forced by most educational institutions. Science that STOPS or IGNORES contradictions to its current theory is NOT science at all but religion, and the teaching of science that has already been refuted is propaganda, NOT education. Much of what passes for origins education today, under the guise of science, is completely un- or anti- scientific, and sites like this allow the other side to be explored. eg few sites other that those like this will explore the findings of C14 in dinosaur bones at Hell's Creek MT, and presented to an international geology conference in Australia. That ONE issue negates so much of current dating education. BUT it IS censored from public education. Since the supporters of current "scientific" theories espouse lying to students and the teaching of century old frauds as facts - other avenues of study are necessary for an intelligent and scientifically literate population. What conclusion those that see it come to is irrelevant; they had the OPPORTUNITY to see two sides of the issue, rather than the censored version so protected by some avenues of science. Hence I give this site two thumbs up for Children especially, and also adults that are fed up with the arrogance and condescention of the evolutionary crowd and their censorship of any competing science.

Misleading claims the owner(s) or editors of the site have not looked into properly so as to inform themselves to ensure their position is accurate. E.g. beginning articles and other content promising to spectacularly debunk well-known established scientific facts, diminishing them as mere theories that have to be taken on as much faith as religion has to because the common man is not present to witness and observe every detail of it, then failing to deliver and making utter fools of themselves. This manner of content goes hand in hand with the condescending overtones, dubious or (most frequently) simply uncited sources and the circular reasoning (which is the only type they seem to know of) that is applied here. I beg you do not expose your children to this; if you must - only as an example to show how not to commit research or think critically and the often serious implications that come with such abuse of the mind.

Fearful people who adhere to 19th Century science rather than changing with the outpouring of new information hate this site. It makes sense and contends with their propaganda. With no real arguments to put forward, they instead like about the site and claim it is unsuitable for children. The complete opposite is true, allow your children to question opinions and investigate and think critically rather than be mas-produced workers clinging to their Androids.