Is rationalwiki.org Safe?

Considered safe by WOT

4.4
starstarstarstarhalf-star
(73 Reviews)
Good site
Opinions, religion, politics
Popular
Claim this site
Share:
Share your thoughts...
K
starempty-star
Poor
starempty-star
Fair
starempty-star
Average
starempty-star
Good
starempty-star
Excellent
73 Reviews by the community
Sort by:
Newest
The most trustworthy online protection
4 months ago
Community site full of terrible hate and adult content
Helpful
·
Report
1 year ago
Not bad, but it does seems to have a leftist slant sometimes to its detriment
Helpful
·
Report
1 year ago
Not a reliable site for TRUTH. openly chides true Christianity, not understanding Scripture because it has not been revealed to them by GOD THE HOLY SPIRIT.
Helpful
·
Report
a
rationalwiki.org berichtet einseitig atheistisch. Argumente der Gegenseite werden komplett unterschlagen!
Helpful
·
Report
2 years ago
They seem to have nothing good to say about anyone. It's just a raunchy humor site, I guess. At least, I'm certain they find the site funny. It's all insult humor. To each his own.
Helpful
·
Report
j
2 years ago
Dismantles the cranks. Warning, may contain sarcasm.
Helpful
·
Report
d
Great anti-pseudoscience, anti-quackery, anti-authoritarianism resource! Rational Wiki is slightly biased pro-left no doubt. There are, however, some articles that do criticize the left or other people besides just white conservatives: https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Antifascist_Action#Internal_divisions https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Bait-and-switch#Motte_and_bailey https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Black_supremacy https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Female_supremacy https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Hard_green https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Moralistic_fallacy https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Shoehorning#Politics https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Social_justice_warrior https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Social_media_platforms#Tumblr https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Southern_Poverty_Law_Center#Criticism RW does have fair share of opinion crept in, though, ought to be noted. Thankfully, like Wikipedia, there sometimes is the "Citation needed" -note in place where a citation hasn't been added. Oftentimes citations can be found. Sections on logical arguments are gold! Recommended alongside many other sources.
1
·
Report
g
3 years ago
With the pervasiveness of misinformation, half truths and outright lies to be found in social media it is absolutely necessary that sites like this exist to inform and educate and to foster critical thinking.
1
·
Report
3 years ago
Not exactly the most accurate, but very entertaining.
1
·
Report
4 years ago
Site satirique combattant diverses pseudosciences. Ne cache pas ses prise de position.
2
·
Report
4 years ago
This is a good and useful site since it promotes rational thought and helps debunks some of the more pernicious lies, disinformation campaigns and other poison that can be found on the internet. I would consider this child-friendly as well since one would want their children to be wise and think for themselves.
2
·
Report
T
4 years ago
This website is run by feminists, which means that everything in this article is biased against male. Use this site for humor only.
1
·
Report
4 years ago
Some language (e.g., bulls--t). View it before your kids do.
Helpful
·
Report
D
5 years ago
Worst of the worst regressive left propaganda. Site even promotes pedophilia. Sick fucks. Not safe for children at all.
1
·
Report
O
5 years ago
Whether it is a joke or somebody actually believes crazy stuff they write on this site, it should be marked as such instead of masquerading as a wikipedia-type page.
1
·
Report
w
5 years ago
I'll start with an edited tweet by Anita Sarkeesian. http://i.imgur.com/pFsUupa.png Metapedia has poor ratings because it's (at least it seems to be) a Neo-nazi wiki. Rationalwiki may not take itself seriously, but it deserves to be treated equally to its slightly less rational counterparts.
Helpful
·
Report
5 years ago
Very informative, covers the main areas of pseudoscience (religious or otherwise), conspiracy theories and alien-spotting. Calls a spade a spade.
2
·
Report
M
5 years ago
No viruses or any other sort. However, it is terribly biased towards third wave feminism/atheism : "Christina Hoff Sommers (born 1950) is a self-declared feminist" http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Christina_Hoff_Sommers -Note the word "self-declared" Questionable use of language and is also a for-atheism site. I am not religious, but Wikipedia is a better source of unbiased information than this site. TL;DR Website is safe, information is slightly biased
Helpful
·
Report
R
5 years ago
They bias here is amazing. The info here is mostly factual but cherry-picked so any factuality is canceled out. They slander and bash anyone who does not share their Atheism+ SJWhiner viewpoints regardless of what those groups/people believe.
1
·
Report
5 years ago
This is a wiki that catalogs all kinds of conspiracy theories and pseudoscience. Naturally a portion of the population such as flat Earthers are really really going to hate it. Bookmarked.
2
·
Report
«
123
...
4
»

About this site

Trustworthiness
88
/100
Child Safety
84
/100
This site uses cookies for analytics and personalised content. By continuing to browse this site, you agree to our cookies policy
Accept