Is rationalwiki.org Safe?

Trusted by WOT Community

4.4
starstarstarstarhalf-star
(76 Reviews)
Good site
Opinions, religion, politics
Claim this site
Ask our community
Share:

rationalwiki.org

4.4
starstarstarstarhalf-star
(76 Reviews)
add-to-undefinedINSTALL WOT
Protect Your Phone
1. Get alerts about unsafe websites.
2. Block adult content.
3. Stay safe on the go.
Share your thoughts...
starempty-star
Poor
starempty-star
Fair
starempty-star
Average
starempty-star
Good
starempty-star
Excellent
76 Reviews by the community
Sort by:
Newest
The most trustworthy online protection
Bobby Lawson
Dec 26, 2019
Dec 26, 2019
starstarstarempty-starempty-star
Not bad, but it does seems to have a leftist slant sometimes to its detriment
Kay Cude
Aug 17, 2019
Aug 17, 2019
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
Not a reliable site for TRUTH. openly chides true Christianity, not understanding Scripture because it has not been revealed to them by GOD THE HOLY SPIRIT.
a.schueler.design
Mar 6, 2019
Mar 6, 2019
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
rationalwiki.org berichtet einseitig atheistisch. Argumente der Gegenseite werden komplett unterschlagen!
Catherine Conrad
Feb 17, 2019
Feb 17, 2019
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
They seem to have nothing good to say about anyone. It's just a raunchy humor site, I guess. At least, I'm certain they find the site funny. It's all insult humor. To each his own.
johnhaverysamuel
Sep 25, 2018
Sep 25, 2018
starstarstarstarstar
Dismantles the cranks. Warning, may contain sarcasm.
d914gj+4dumqkghj3yvgc
Jun 22, 2018
Jun 22, 2018
starstarstarstarstar
Great anti-pseudoscience, anti-quackery, anti-authoritarianism resource! Rational Wiki is slightly biased pro-left no doubt. There are, however, some articles that do criticize the left or other people besides just white conservatives: https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Antifascist_Action#Internal_divisions https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Bait-and-switch#Motte_and_bailey https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Black_supremacy https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Female_supremacy https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Hard_green https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Moralistic_fallacy https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Shoehorning#Politics https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Social_justice_warrior https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Social_media_platforms#Tumblr https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Southern_Poverty_Law_Center#Criticism RW does have fair share of opinion crept in, though, ought to be noted. Thankfully, like Wikipedia, there sometimes is the "Citation needed" -note in place where a citation hasn't been added. Oftentimes citations can be found. Sections on logical arguments are gold! Recommended alongside many other sources.
gareth edwards
Feb 25, 2018
Feb 25, 2018
starstarstarstarstar
With the pervasiveness of misinformation, half truths and outright lies to be found in social media it is absolutely necessary that sites like this exist to inform and educate and to foster critical thinking.
Sake Bomb
Oct 15, 2017
Oct 15, 2017
Not exactly the most accurate, but very entertaining.
Shoggoth
Jun 18, 2017
Jun 18, 2017
starstarstarstarempty-star
Site satirique combattant diverses pseudosciences. Ne cache pas ses prise de position.
A440
Mar 25, 2017
Mar 25, 2017
starstarstarstarstar
This is a good and useful site since it promotes rational thought and helps debunks some of the more pernicious lies, disinformation campaigns and other poison that can be found on the internet. I would consider this child-friendly as well since one would want their children to be wise and think for themselves.
The Doge
Dec 25, 2016
Dec 25, 2016
starstarstarempty-starempty-star
This website is run by feminists, which means that everything in this article is biased against male. Use this site for humor only.
Lizzie G. F.
Dec 9, 2016
Dec 9, 2016
starstarstarhalf-starempty-star
Some language (e.g., bulls--t). View it before your kids do.
David Thensin
Mar 31, 2016
Mar 31, 2016
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
Worst of the worst regressive left propaganda. Site even promotes pedophilia. Sick fucks. Not safe for children at all.
OneTwoThreeFour
Dec 19, 2015
Dec 19, 2015
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
Whether it is a joke or somebody actually believes crazy stuff they write on this site, it should be marked as such instead of masquerading as a wikipedia-type page.
wildarmor
Dec 4, 2015
Dec 4, 2015
I'll start with an edited tweet by Anita Sarkeesian. http://i.imgur.com/pFsUupa.png Metapedia has poor ratings because it's (at least it seems to be) a Neo-nazi wiki. Rationalwiki may not take itself seriously, but it deserves to be treated equally to its slightly less rational counterparts.
anarchic teapot
Nov 30, 2015
Nov 30, 2015
starstarstarstarhalf-star
Very informative, covers the main areas of pseudoscience (religious or otherwise), conspiracy theories and alien-spotting. Calls a spade a spade.
Moodkill
Nov 20, 2015
Nov 20, 2015
No viruses or any other sort. However, it is terribly biased towards third wave feminism/atheism : "Christina Hoff Sommers (born 1950) is a self-declared feminist" http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Christina_Hoff_Sommers -Note the word "self-declared" Questionable use of language and is also a for-atheism site. I am not religious, but Wikipedia is a better source of unbiased information than this site. TL;DR Website is safe, information is slightly biased
Ryaniskira
Oct 30, 2015
Oct 30, 2015
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
They bias here is amazing. The info here is mostly factual but cherry-picked so any factuality is canceled out. They slander and bash anyone who does not share their Atheism+ SJWhiner viewpoints regardless of what those groups/people believe.
Apollo702
Oct 20, 2015
Oct 20, 2015
starstarstarstarhalf-star
This is a wiki that catalogs all kinds of conspiracy theories and pseudoscience. Naturally a portion of the population such as flat Earthers are really really going to hate it. Bookmarked.
Starm4nn
Jul 8, 2015
Jul 8, 2015
starstarstarstarstar
Contains many examples of logic and arguments against religion.
«
123
...
4
»

About this site

Trustworthiness
88
/100
Child Safety
84
/100