Sadly, I believe his basic assumption about Splenda is correct, but the Author didn't support his assertions completely and thoroughly enough with facts that could be followed easily in a series of logical and verifiable steps for consumers. Additionally, the ***** link referred to as the information source is an open/unused/not active website domain - offered to be purchased - it is not a resource site at all. That alone begs the question of validity. I think the whole site is really just a hot-button scare-tactic marketing hook to get you to buy the products at the end.
If you have an appreciation for no BS health tips, this is the site for you.. he drops the occasional F Bomb, but there are a lot worse things going on in the world. I have been ordering the products to Australia for nearly 5 years now.. Never an issue.
I've used this site without any problems at all (eg, no un-requested emaisl or use of credentials or financial details).
The owner has strong opinions so that's potentially the reason there are negatives (I haven't read any reviews on WOT yet).
Anyhow, I think the site, the info offered thereon and the supplements are legit and have worked very well for me.
Why is this site rated as a negative? A quick look at the comments show a lot more trust comments. If a few more people would listen to these guys, America wouldn't be so ill. I have been coming to this site for 4+ years, tried many of the formulas and the blog suggestions. Its a big thumbs up from me.
EDIT - I *DID* RATE THIS - AS TRUSTED!!!!
I see no reason for a negative rating on this site. It's views may not be in line with MSM or big pharma, but the information is truthful and educational.
I've been noticing this at WOT - even if a site is NOT questionable, but it's views are not in line with the MSM - then ONE bad (anonymous) vote is enough to give it a bad rating.
Why? Who owns WOT??
It's a huge scam. Uses misinformation and pseudoscience to extract $$$ from gullible and anxious parents, leaving their children and those of other people at risk from potentially serious illnesses.
"This deep sleep process reverses the aging curse every night and it’s called REM sleep!"
Delta wave/Deep sleep is NOT the same thing as Paradoxical/REM sleep. It is delta/deep sleep that is the "deepest" stage of sleep (not REM), and it is this stage that is most restorative to the physical body. In summary, DEEP SLEEP <> REM!
SCAM! Quackery and pseudo-science come together to separate desperate & gullible fools from their money. Claims to "cure cancer for $1 per day". Evil.
Also virulently anti-vaccination, it spreads all the propaganda and lies of the anti-vax lunatic fringe. It's a danger to public health and safety.
No problems at all with this website. I myself have bought a book from them. Seriously, you motherfucking WOT rating spambots are the one who needs to be banned from the internet.
Because they registered on a registrar which you call 'a disgrace to the internet community' DOES NOT mean EVERY SINGLE website registered with then are UNSAFE.
It seems that all the negative ratings are actually based on the registrar and not this site, itself ( www.thepeopleschemist.com ).
Why is this even possible? Who ( and why ) can give sites negative ratings because of the company with whom they register?? It's mind-boggling, to be honest. I love WOT, I just find myself bewildered by this.
Shane says he once worked for big pharma and is now an outsider after realizing they are just mimicking mother nature with medicine that work no better than folk medicine BUT with the side effect included.
It's not surprising he has made enemies with big pharma who now sook attack dogs on him hoping to ruin his reputation to their level.
I've learned lots of positive, valid, factual information essential to good health, as well as ordered several of the product. I've also read Shane's book on OTC natural cures and find it very usefully enlightening. The negative reviews given about this site are probably put forth by pharmaceutical thugs. Don't listen to them!
So far I have not experienced any malware or other dangers listed in previous ratings. And after checking on information on other sites I found most information to be trustworthy
If someone tells you the truth about how to get well, shouldn't you trust him? I wouldn't be at all surprised to find out that "big pharma" is giving him a poor rating!