Is Safe?

Trusted by WOT

Website security score

WOT’s security score is based on our unique technology and community expert reviews.
Is this website claimed?
Community reviews
★ 4.7
WOT’s algorithm
Child Safety

What does the community say?

Leave a review

How would you rate this website from 1 to 5?
Share your feedback and help the communityReviews must consist of at least 15 charactersChoose the tags that best describe this website
Malware or Viruses
Poor customer service
Potentially illegal
Misleading or unethical
Privacy Risk
Hate, discrimination
Potential unwanted program
Ads / Pop-ups
Adult Content
Incidental nudity
Gruesome or shocking
Post Review

Based on 32 reviews

Sort by:
In my opinion this is usless website. In google you'll find more options and informations.
free travel info, although not be confused with Wikipedia despite the similar name
COLLABORATIVE, OPEN, FREEWikitravel gives me always good tips about any country I want to visit, what is written always match the reality
Un site de type wiki mais sans la communauté, d'où des informations franchement discutables et à la qualité aléatoire. Bref, ça peut à la rigueur être intéressant, mais croisez toujours vos sources et vérifiez la date des contributions.
informative website.............
like all wikis normal people may edit certain content but nonetheless a very useful site for those travelling
This site has a lot of things wrong with it. Wikitravel used to be a great site for travel, but things have changed since 2009. The website is now corporately-owned and run, meaning the primary goal is profit and not the spread of travel knowledge. Ads are littered across the site and popup in your face. The volunteers of the site who created and curated the content requested for years for technical and feature support, but were simply ignored. So when they got up and left for the Wikimedia Foundation in 2012, the corporation responded by suing unpaid volunteers who had helped make it happen. Of course, the case was thrown out of court, but it goes to show how evil this company truly is. Finally, as there are no more volunteers who actively check the site, it is now overrun by spam and false information. I call upon you to compare the guides between Wikitravel and Wikivoyage, the WMF alternative, and see for yourself how degraded the WT guides are becoming.
super cool site for travel, finally we got own wiki for travel
I have used ***** for about 2-3 years and find it invaluable in travelling. Especially in the Smartphone era, the availability of this website via my mobile browser has helped me in more ways than I can count. It's free, and I dare say I've even added a line or two of my own here & there. The admins are convivial and responsive. They've got the travel tiger by the tail, they do!
Starting point for every travel.
Super Seite für Touristen
To the folks posting "Nice details from wikitravel by wikimedia " or "Travel guide from Wikimedia ", YOU HAVE BEEN HAD. This piece of ad-ridden garbage is not the work of Wikipedia or the Wikimedia Foundation. It only looks vaguely similar in layout to legitimate Wikimedia projects because the WMF makes its custom-built wiki software (MediaWiki) available as a free download for anyone... even sites parodying Wikipedia. Wikimedia has a travel guide... at ***** One can tell the sites apart very easily, as Wikivoyage (like any other project of the 501c3 non-profit Wikimedia Foundation) is free of advertising, while this heap of spam shows at least two ads per page (one for air bookings, one for hotel bookings) and an outdated copy of the same text that's on Wikivoyage. Unfortunately, this site is still editable and promoters therefore are routinely inserting text touting their own hotels. Make the mistake of visiting this site without Firefox's AdBlock extension and the level of advertising becomes worse still, to the point where ads crowd out content.
I noticed a lot of recent bad comments after a competitor told their users to come here and bash Wikitravel. For shame. Well, you can look at the previous years of great reviews from various writers. Love Wikitravel :)
Wikitravel (or Internet Brands) doesn't own the content on this website. It's owned by its respective authors. Internet Brands claims to be using the content under a Creative Commons - Attribution - Share Alike license like that used for Wikipedia articles. Only one problem... they do not comply with this license. They have systematically removed any means of downloading data, which puts them in violation of the "share alike" provision in the free license. As violation of the license terms ends the license to use the content, this site should be shut down on behalf of the authors of this material. They have also commenced frivolous and vexatious litigation against a number of authors, a very dumb move for a site based on free content written by others, and the site itself is ad-ridden garbage. If you want facts, go to Wikipedia and give this site a miss.
Wikitravel for traveling.
Controversy: Serious questions have been raised whether this firm has been grossly unethical in abusing its Creative Commons licensing to freely copy, distribute and transmit or adapt compositions. See *****
gute Reiseinfos
like all wikis normal people may edit certain content but nonetheless a very useful site for those travelling
All Contents are Child Friendly, Your Kid will be safe here :)
Check If You’ve Been CompromisedConnect with Google to scan your browsing history.
Connect with Google
As seen on
By signing in, you agree to data collection and use as described in our Terms Of Use and Privacy Policy

About WOT

We reviewed more than 2 Million website and counting. WOT is a lightweight extension designed to help you browse quickly and securely. It will clean your browser, speed it up, and protect your private information.

Is this your website?

Claim your website to access WOT’s business tools and connect with your customers.
This site uses cookies for analytics and personalised content. By continuing to browse this site, you agree to our cookies policy