Le site www.sciencebasedmedicine.org est-il sûr ?

La confiance de WOT

Score de sécurité du site web

89%
Le score de sécurité de WOT est basé sur notre technologie unique et sur les avis des experts de la communauté.
Ce site est-il revendiqué ?
Non
Avis de la Communauté
★ 4.7
L'algorithme de WOT
93%
Sécurité pour les Enfants
92%

Que dit la communauté ?

Laisser un commentaire

Quelle note entre 1 et 5 donneriez-vous à ce site ?
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
Faites part de vos commentaires et aidez la communautéLes commentaires doivent comporter au moins 15 caractèresChoisissez les tags qui décrivent le mieux ce site web
Logiciels malveillants ou virus
Mauvais service client
Hameçonnage
Escroquerie
Potentiellement illégal
Fallacieux ou contraire à l’éthique
Risques relatifs à la confidentialité
Suspect
Haine, discrimination
Escroquerie
Programme potentiellement indésirable
Publicités / fenêtres pop-up
Contenu pour adultes
Nudité accidentelle
Violent ou choquant
Annuler
Publier le commentaire
4.7
starstarstarstarhalf-star

Basé sur 36 avis

Classer par :
Le plus récent
Methodical approach to parroting the official narritave
Utile
Good science blog.
1
This site is an excellent source for science and health-related issues that rely upon science. I recommend this site as being eminently trustworthy.
1
Linus Pauling was a threat and had evidence to suggest that modern medicine was not science based at all. Then these debunker sites called exactly "science based medicine" pop up. Oh dear, the irony. Your naming convention imply's you are not that confident that medicine is actually science based.
1
This site claims to be "science-based medicine", but this is just a code for an excuse to attack forms of medicine that they don't like, including the obvious quackery (which is good to attack) as well as the attempts at modernizing the medical system, or applying more personal approaches (no reason to attack these.) Unfortunately, these attack dogs can't distinguish good vs. bad.. New and experimental = bad according their fixed mindset. If you came here to find out whether something new and unusual in the medical field is OK or not, their answer is simply "no". That's the safe position no matter what. They love to use science to support their viewpoints, but resort to pure old emotion and logical fallacies when attacking anything new. The site certainly is NOT harmful, but not as scientific as the name implies.
1
This website is the best site for accurate analysis of information. Unfortunately, the anti-science people does not get the truth and down vote this website.
1
Artículos rigurosos sobre polémicas en el ámbito de la ciencia y de la medicina
Utile
It does what it says on the tin, quality information on science based medicine and debunking of quackery.
2
Biased website. Anti-religious material also.
1
Lots of scripts but the blog runs fine without any of them. Good information.
5
The site's claims are unfounded. The use of junk pseudoscience is abundant. International scientific consensus all over the world disagrees with everything this page promotes. This page is pure junk.
6
Go to sites like this if you want science and reason behind your medicine. Hokey people who believe in things like snake oil and other scams are going to vote against sites like this.
7
An excellent resource for all topics relating to science and medicine. Here you can find in-depth analyses covering the full spectrum of 'alternative' medicine, including a critical examination of the scientific evidence (or lack thereof) in support of their use. Essays on medical ethics, academia, public health policy, and science in the media are also insightful. Criticism is also given to the legitimate shortcomings of the current state of the healthcare profession. This site is an essential reference for medical students, doctors, nurses and anyone else working in healthcare. Science-Based Medicine is everything that The Dr. Oz Show should have been.
6
Excellent, science-based website
4
To resume this site opinion; alternative medicine is full of side effects while there are full of benefits taking traditional drug medicine (they dont even discuss the very dangerous side effects of MOST pharmaceutical drugs). Yea...
5
David Gorski, the site owner, is a scammer, pulling in millions from BigPharma. By receiving the booty through a third party, his employer, Wayne State University, he covers his tracks just like all BigPharma front men. Don't believe it? lol. Just google: David Gorski, Riluzole,Sanofi-Aventis
4
Medical professionals dispelling health related myths.
8
A damn good site for #science and medical info, especially debunking #quackery. Should be in everyone's bookmarks. #medicine
11
The go-to site for any question about medical claims.
6
Fantastic site - this multi-author blog is devastatingly good at surgically dissecting pseudoscience, alt-med scams, and the craziness of anti-vaxxers.
9
12
Vérifiez si vous avez été compromisConnectez-vous à Google pour analyser votre historique de navigation.
Se connecter avec Google
Tel que vu sur
En vous connectant, vous acceptez la collecte et l'utilisation des données telles qu'elles sont décrites dans notre site web. Conditions d'utilisation et Politique de Confidentialité
alternative-placeholder

À propos de WOT

Nous avons passé en revue plus de 2 millions de sites web et ce n'est pas fini. WOT est une extension légère conçue pour vous aider à naviguer rapidement et en toute sécurité. Il nettoie votre navigateur, l'accélère et protège vos informations privées.

C'est votre site ?

Réclamez votre site web pour accéder aux outils commerciaux de WOT et entrer en contact avec vos clients.
Réclamer ce site
Ce site utilise des cookies à des fins d'analyse et de personnalisation. En continuant, vous acceptez notre politique en matière de cookies.
Accepter