(The quickest way to register)

Blog

Dear visitor! The webpage is only available in English. We're sorry for the inconvenience.

An insider's view of the online adult entertainment industry

 

Adult entertainment websites (often referred to as porn) account for 12% of the total number of web pages on the Internet, and huge numbers of users, around 40 million Americans, view pages with adult content regularly. Despite how common it is to surf porn, the perception among many web users is that adult websites tend to be more dangerous than other types of websites, especially when it comes to security issues such as malware, script based attacks and trust issues such as "shady" marketing tactics. However, at least one adult industry leader is addressing their reputation challenges from the inside - out.

A 'Perfect Storm' hits the adult industry

In a recent keynote speech at Cybernet Expo, an adult industry conference, well-known soft core adult content producer, Steve Lightspeed, spoke about the current state of online adult entertainment and described a "Perfect Storm" of variables affecting the industry as a whole. Long considered a maverick among adult entertainment insiders, Mr. Lightspeed candidly points out the "industry's history of poor business practices and short-term thinking" as one of the main reasons consumers have lost trust and retreated to other forms of entertainment options on the web.

"Shady billing practices, poor quality sites, and lousy customer service have turned many of our own consumers against us," Lightspeed said to an attentive audience of web masters and content producers. "Customers who once trusted us have been ripped off again and again until they absolutely will not be coming back." The plan he laid out is for adult site owners to reclaim their customers by being honest and ethical.

"We need to win our customers back with better products and sites, better customer service, better value, and a better overall surfer experience, " he advocated. Primary in the plan was to "act like a business" and drive the worst offending companies out of business. "Honesty and integrity will ALWAYS win in the long run."

Read Steve Lightspeed's keynote address

Are adult sites really dangerous?

Popular free anti-virus software maker Avast, recently released a study that attempted to answer the question surrounding the "dangerous" reputations of adult sites. In their study they found 99 infected mainstream web pages for every one infected adult web page, making the safety ratio 99:1.

"We are not recommending people to start searching for erotic content but the statistics are clear - for every infected adult domain we identify there are 99 others with perfectly legitimate content that are also infected," commented Avast CTO Ondrej Vlcek.

WOT is your guide through the web's red light district

WOT helps users navigate through all areas of the web, including the red light district. Our millions of community members have rated nearly 29 million websites, helping web surfers, including those who frequent adult sites, to know which ones are considered trustworthy and have reliable business practices that look after your privacy.

Mr Lightspeed says of WOT, "I was happy to meet WOT at Cybernet.  Their product is a great tool for keeping children away from porn, and for helping our audience find the honest companies in adult entertainment." He added, "I like pie."

Please help us continue to boost trust on the web by adding your ratings and testimonials for the sites you visit. Also, let us know your perception of the trustworthiness of adult entertainment sites by voting in the WOT poll and contributing to the discussion.

Trackback URL for this post:

http://www.mywot.com/en/trackback/7002

Comments

  1. User picture
    • Deborah S. on Fri 23 Jul 2010
    • 02:41:33 PM UTC

    Porn rules the Web

    A new study from Optenet, shows that pornography makes up 37% of the total number of web pages online. Adult content as well as illegal content such as child pornography and illegal drug purchase has increased by 17% in Q1 2010, compared to the same period in 2009. This is significant growth, and as Steve's message informs us, a big part of it comes from those with shady business practices.

    The WOT community boosts trust across the whole web, mainstream and otherwise, and we play an increasingly influential role in helping to wipe out cyber-scams and rip-offs. Keep up the excellent work!

    Please join the conversation about this subject on the WOT Facebook page , or add your comments below.

  2. User picture
    • g7w on Sat 24 Jul 2010
    • 12:10:26 AM UTC

    optenet.com

    The thing about statistics, data-mining, and remarks such as:pornography makes up 37% of the total number of web pages online

    is that they can be "true" and at the same time "false."

    About the Study
    The data contained within the Optenet report is accumulated and compiled from a database of hundreds of millions of URLs, in which network computer threats and security threats are analyzed and updated continually in real-time by experts in Web content, who directly link to the security systems of Optenet’s clients.

    What that tells me is that old, URLs which are no longer valid are still "counted" and also how domains that have expired along with all their pages, are still counted, and also that this information is biased, it only derives from those who "directly link" from Optenet’s clients; meaning that over 1/3 of Optenet’s clients view pr0n.

    As for Avast's information... They say that for 1 pornographic (adult) web page there are 99 non-adult pages, which greatly reduce the stats presented by Optenet. So I suppose statistics are created for a purpose and sites will use those which cater to the sites goals / policies / intentions. Not to mention that Avast is well known for the amount of FP's (false positives) with Malware alerts.

    Pornographic sites are not all "bad" but they all are not suitable for young children and should be, IMHO, filtered accordingly. Any site is subject to compromise which could promote Malware, though there are many fake adult sites, just like those fake pharmacies, whcih has the intent to Phish PII and/or infect the visitor.

    Personally, it's not the pornographic industry that has me worried, it's the "other guys" - those religious nuts out there, who tell me that I have to do things "their way" or "their god will strike me down." :/

    ICANN recently approved the dot-xxx [.xxx] gTLD so are we to expect the flip-side and see a dot-god [.god] domains to follow?

    >:-)
    -------
    WOT Services Ltd. - gives us safety through Web of Trust.
    WOT Community - gives us security through unity.
    Thank you all
    - G7W

    • User picture
      • BobJam (not verified) on Sat 24 Jul 2010
      • 06:27:17 AM UTC

      Agree with qualification

      @ Dave,

      While I don't disagree that lunatic fringe religious fundamentalists sites are sometimes worrisome (as I recall, we had some nut that claimed to be able to revive dead people a while back), I think you would agree that the risk of getting infections from porn sites is much greater than from those religious sites.

      • User picture
        • g7w on Sat 24 Jul 2010
        • 02:28:01 PM UTC

        risk of getting infections

        I ended my post with a textual emoticon for an "evil grin" - I used to know them but... getting older, I had to search for the "expression."

        risk of getting infections
        IMO, the risk of getting computer infections is equal from all sites that have low security concerns. The more prominent pornography sites appear to maintain a decent control of their servers as would a prominent religious site. As far as the user becoming "infected" ...

        An interesting poll would be,
        "Of the following 2 choices, which would you trust more?"
        • scientology.org
        • playboy.com
        • User picture
          • BobJam (not verified) on Sat 24 Jul 2010
          • 05:15:03 PM UTC

          Playboy?

          I hardly think playboy.com is representative of hardcore porn, and we all know scientology.org is representative of a controversial site. So, I think your "poll" is "rigged".

          Let's try something a little more generic and representative of the two concepts:

          1. church.com
          2. xxx.com
          • User picture
            • g7w on Sat 24 Jul 2010
            • 09:09:12 PM UTC

            hardcore porn

            I wasn't aware of the OP as differentiating between "soft / medium / hard" pornography; hence my submission of playboy.com

            scientology was "picked out of the hat" so-to-speak; I could have used catholic / jewish / christian / baptist / etc...

            FYI, both church.com and xxx.com are registered domains and both are parked, but I get your point, so I'll choose... xxx.com.