Ist conservapedia.com sicher?
Verdächtige Website
Sicherheitsbewertung der Website
27%
Wird diese Website beansprucht?
Nein
Community-Rezensionen
★ 1.6
WOTs Algorithmus
32%
Jugendschutz
N/A
Was sagt die Gemeinschaft dazu?
Eine Bewertung hinterlassen
Teilen Sie Ihr Feedback und helfen Sie der GemeinschaftBewertungen müssen aus mindestens 15 Zeichen bestehenWählen Sie die Tags, die diese Website am besten beschreiben
Malware oder Viren
Schlechter Kundenservice
Phishing
Scam
Potenziell illegal
Irreführend oder unethisch
Risiko für die Privatsphäre
Verdächtig
Hass, Diskrimination
Spam
Potenziell unerwünschtes Programm
Werbung / Pop-ups
Inhalte für Erwachsene
Zufällige Nacktheit
Grausam oder schockierend
Abbrechen
Bewertung veröffentlichen
1.6
Basierend auf 616 Bewertungen
Sortieren nach:
Neuestes
Prejudiced, paranoid, misinforming propaganda. Not just anti-science but anti-common sense.
1
Some topics on here are as biased are outlandish and derogatory. However I read some articles that I have background knowledge on and I felt that the ones I did read were for the most part unbiased, and contain factual information. (I'm actually surprised they painted Canada in a decent light) But the articles like the one on Gay marriage was full of hate speech. I'd keep this a interesting tool to see opposing views. As far as I could tell no security issues.
1
There is nothing harmful to your computer on this site. WOT users should refrain from letting their personal opinion of website material influence their ratings, lest they nullify the system. Start your own personal opinion rating system if you want to rate a site bad based solely on whether you agree with the content or not. Leave WOT for what it was designed for, to help protect people from spyware, malware, viruses, etc
25
I don't understand why some of the ratings are poor for this site. I have found nothing hateful or deceitful on this site, nor have I found any phishing or other types of computer attacks from this server.
11
This is a good site as far as safety goes. There certainly will be ideological differences, but that will will not harm your computer.
5
It's a disgusting hate site dedicated to hateful views and an anti-science perspective. Unfortunately it's no joke.
Hilfreich
This is not a bad site. The only people that give it negative votes are atheist trolls that are just trying to censor things they don't agree with.
Hilfreich
Good site for conservatives and others able to entertain the conservative perspective and method.
1
Interesting site for reading on conservative views, but not all facts are accurate.
3
Excellent site. Much more dependable than Wikipedia. There is nothing "hateful" or inaccurate about the contents of this site. It is reprehensible that bad ratings are being given to this site simply because it is U.S. conservative. Those ratings are pure leftist propaganda.
Hilfreich
This site is harmless. While this site is anti-science, it does not deserve "red" ratings as if it were a porn site, infested with malware, commercially dishonest or containing poisoned links. "Poor" ratings must not be used just because one disagrees with a site's religious views.
1
Brainwashing and extreme right, anti-scientific bias. Children shouldn't see sites like this, it's hard enough to educate without this sort of drivel being touted as truth.
Hilfreich
This sight is extremely Biased and very unreliable for information. Most of it is false
Hilfreich
A different point of view. No hate noticed.
1
This site seems to contain several half-truths specifically designed to deceive its reader. Strongly NOT recommended.
Hilfreich
It's a great site. Don't believe all the insane liberals.
3
People don't like it cause it differs from their opinion. Safe site!
25
Nothing wrong with reading what other people think. It's all up to you if you agree or not.
2
People give the site bad marks simply because it clashes with their point of view. Is it really a surprise which side of the aisle this website caters to? Condemning something because it is bias and conflicts with personal viewpoints is, ironically, an inherently biased action.
Hilfreich
If WOT does not monitor the accuracy of it's ratings then it is useless to me. This sites poor ratings seem to be based purely on political bias. I really can live without another so called service shoving leftism in my face. I'm very disappointed...
Hilfreich
1819202122
...
31Prüfen Sie, ob Sie kompromittiert wurdenVerbinden Sie sich mit Google, um Ihren Browserverlauf zu scannen.Mit Ihrer Anmeldung stimmen Sie der Datenerfassung und -nutzung zu, wie sie in unserer Nutzungsbedingungen und Datenschutzrichtlinie
Mit Google verbinden
Gesehen bei
Über WOT
Wir haben mehr als 2 Millionen Websites überprüft, Tendenz steigend. WOT ist eine leichtgewichtige Erweiterung, mit der Sie schnell und sicher surfen können. Es bereinigt Ihren Browser, beschleunigt ihn und schützt Ihre privaten Daten.Ist das Ihre Website?
Melden Sie Ihre Website an, um Zugang zu WOTs Business-Tools zu erhalten und mit Ihren Kunden in Kontakt zu treten.Diese Website beanspruchen
WoT installierenDiese Website verwendet Cookies für Analysezwecke und zur Personalisierung. Indem Sie fortfahren, erklären Sie sich mit unseren Cookie-Richtlinie.
Akzeptieren