conservapedia.comは安全ですか?

疑わしいウェブサイト

ウェブサイトのセキュリティスコア

27%
WOT のセキュリティ スコアは、当社独自のテクノロジーとコミュニティの専門家によるレビューに基づいています。
このウェブサイトは申請済みですか?
いいえ
コミュニティレビュー
★ 1.6
WOTのアルゴリズム
32%
子供の安全性
該当なし

コミュニティは何と言っていますか?

レビューを残す

このウェブサイトを1から5の間で、どのように評価しますか?
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
フィードバックを共有してコミュニティに貢献しましょうレビューは少なくとも15文字で構成されている必要がありますこのウェブサイトを最もよく表すタグを選択してください
マルウェアあるいはウイルス
顧客サービスが悪い
フィッシング
詐欺
違法の可能性がある
誤解を招くあるいは倫理に反している
プライバシーリスク
不審
憎悪、差別的
スパム
潜在的に迷惑なプログラム
広告/ポップアップ
アダルトコンテンツ
卑猥な可能性がある
残酷あるいは刺激的
キャンセル
レビューの投稿
1.6
starhalf-starempty-starempty-starempty-star

618のレビューに基づく

並び順:
最新
I havent seen this much of misinformation, propaganda and hate speech in a while
役立つ
I thought this site was a parody, sadly it's not. Contain a lot of hateful content.
1
Technically safe, but riddled with hate and misinformation so stupid it feels like parody. Too bad it isn't.
1
Can be more accurate than Wikipedia, as it allows primary sources.
役立つ
If this site is satire it's too on the nose. If it isn't then satire is dead.
役立つ
This website has passable content. The point that it has been rated poorly is because people are not inclined to see the other side of the political spectrum.
1
No malware, trojans, XSS it is safe.
1
The level of misinformation is comical. It's basically just Wikipedia for the most fringe far-right conspiracy theorist nutjobs.
1
Misinformation and hate
役立つ
The validity of the information is obviously questionable. All the characteristics of a satirical site, but the amount of information on it and the resemblance to Wikipedia make it dangerous. It is absolutely sad and horrible that a contrived website such as this exists to prey on people's stupidity. It is also equally sad that there are so many that think that this site presents reality.
1
Unfiltered religious propaganda. Nothing states how terrible this site is than clicking on almost any topic and it will be sure to throw out what the bible says first, then lightly stating scientific consensus disagrees (if they're being kind, otherwise they omit that and run with it). This was created because some people disagree with real science so they made their alternative reality (loony land).
3
It's alright, much like Wikipedia, it's not correct all the time, and obviously leans towards the right, much like how wikipedia, with political points, leans towards the left.
1
Religious propaganda, pure fantasy and nonsense.
3
Let truth resound. Whether or not the naysayers accept it or not, truth stands as revealed in God's inerrant Word.
1
Yes, a conservative site and very connected to Christian faith, but cannot be categorized as "hate speech" or "fake news" as others do. It actually shows conservative/right-leaning views otherwise difficult to find.
1
Apparently women aren't smart enough to be a great chess player.
3
Conservatively biased "encyclopedia". Don't expect actual information here.
3
This is just a religious propaganda. It just uses the bible to say the bible is correct. It gives no other sources. if you want to research and get data go to original wiki.
3
Lots of info that Liberals do not like to be confronted with. As a result they blast the site. Think fragility: "The site cannot say these things cuz they hurt my feelings." or some such. Set feelings aside and do some work. WOT also is biased so I get a red donut - LOL
1
I read a review that objected to this site giving credence to the Bible as to the reason the Moon is where it is. However, I can't get a single one of these offended people to answer either of these two questions... One, Where did the "STUFF" that makes op the Universe Come From? Two, What is beyond the Universe? The only Answer to these Questions involves a God of some Kind. This Site simply acknowledges the truth of the obvious fact that a God of some kind does exist. You may argue what kind of God but the fact of a God is set until you can answer the two questions and I don't mean a theory that spins faster than a Politicians backsteps. And Yes the fact that there is a "NOTHING" beyond the Universe is proof there is a God. And the Proof that Something had to BE before the "STUFF" the Universe is Made up of or the "STUFF" itself must be a God Because only God can Exist Forever. Either way, God does exist. And Yet the Person left this One-Star review of the Site Like many others enough to give this site a WOT Caution label for no reason but THEY are BIAS: ................ A site so hopelessly biased that I can't think of any meaningful use for it. Take this quote from their article on the Moon, yeah, totally unbiased and TRUSTWORTHY ! lol "Atheistic science has proposed a number of naturalistic theories to explain the Origin of the Moon, including a second planet colliding with Earth or even a second moon colliding with the first.[6] None of these atheistic theories of origin is plausible. The Bible explains that the Moon was created separately on Day Four along with the Sun and stars."
1
12345
...
31
侵害されていないか確認するGoogle に接続して閲覧履歴をスキャンします。
Google と接続
掲載されているもの
サインインすることで、当社の定めるデータ収集と使用に同意したことになります。 利用規約 及び 個人情報保護方針
alternative-placeholder

WOT について

私たちは 200 万以上のウェブサイトをレビューしました。 WOT は、迅速かつ安全にブラウジングできるように設計された軽量拡張機能です。 ブラウザをクリーンアップし、速度を上げ、個人情報を保護します。

これはあなたのウェブサイトですか?

ウェブサイトを申請して、WOT のビジネス ツールにアクセスし、顧客とつながりましょう。
このウェブサイトを連携する
このサイトでは分析とパーソナライズのために Cookie を使用しています。 続行すると、当社の クッキーポリシー。
受け入れる