Ist johnlocke.org sicher?

Vertraut von WOT

Sicherheitsbewertung der Website

53%
Die Sicherheitsbewertung von WOT basiert auf unserer einzigartigen Technologie und den Bewertungen der Community-Experten.
Wird diese Website beansprucht?
Nein
Community-Rezensionen
★ 3.1
WOTs Algorithmus
62%
Jugendschutz
N/A

Was sagt die Gemeinschaft dazu?

Eine Bewertung hinterlassen

Wie würden Sie diese Website auf einer Skala von 1 bis 5 bewerten?
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
Teilen Sie Ihr Feedback und helfen Sie der GemeinschaftBewertungen müssen aus mindestens 15 Zeichen bestehenWählen Sie die Tags, die diese Website am besten beschreiben
Malware oder Viren
Schlechter Kundenservice
Phishing
Scam
Potenziell illegal
Irreführend oder unethisch
Risiko für die Privatsphäre
Verdächtig
Hass, Diskrimination
Spam
Potenziell unerwünschtes Programm
Werbung / Pop-ups
Inhalte für Erwachsene
Zufällige Nacktheit
Grausam oder schockierend
Abbrechen
Bewertung veröffentlichen
3.1
starstarstarempty-starempty-star

Basierend auf 17 Bewertungen

Sortieren nach:
Neuestes
This site has good information.
Hilfreich
I am beginning to get fed up with the negative ratings on WOT based solely on political biases. The people who have rated the John Locke Foundation as Hate and discrimination are themselves being discriminatory against other political philosophies.
1
people that disagree with the study results lie about the web site. nothing new about that.
Hilfreich
Once a again political troll has downmarkt this site. Nothing wrong with it. You don't hav to agree with its philosophy but that's no reason to mark it down.
Hilfreich
Founded in 1990, The John Locke Foundation employs research, journalism, and outreach programs to transform government through competition, innovation, personal freedom, and personal responsibility. JLF seeks a better balance between the public sector and private institutions of family, faith, community, and enterprise.
Hilfreich
@nehouik -- The 97% statistic you quote is made up (no one really knows what an accurate %, as surveys have been self-selected), but you're certainly welcome to your opinion, and I appreciate that you at least took the time to explain your rating. Unfortunately, many of the low ratings in Reliability, Privacy, and Child Safety are just bogus trolling. Too bad, as it's lowering the value of WOT when people do this.
2
This site is safe. They don't phish or collect data or any other type of untrustworthy activity. Do not downgrade a site just because you don't agree with them philosophically. That's childish.
3
Some of these 'political' ratings make WOT a less useful tool. More, it seems, every day... :(
2
The John Locke Foundation is a conservative think tank. They are no where close to being malicious or hateful. They represent conservative/libertarian values and any bad ratings here are from liberal hackers.
3
A reminder of what the categories mean : - Trustworthiness indicates the general level of trust that the users have towards a web site. - Vendor reliability shows the level of trust for business transactions on a website, especially in e-commerce. - Privacy measures the level of trust for protecting users’ privacy. - Child safety signals the level of trust for the site’s suitability for children. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I rated poorly the Trustworthiness not because of ideological opposition to it but because this website/group uses lies to actively mislead their readers and gain support to advocate measures favorable to their corporate supporters. If you read a few comments down from this one, the user "NotBuyingIt" included a link regarding JLF's anti-global-warming propaganda. Anthropogenic (man-made) Global Warming is not a political claim but a scientific one supported by 97% of scientists and it is endorsed as a scientific fact by all major scientific organizations, including NAS, AAAS, NASA, and IPCC. Aside from this corporate-backed propaganda supported by lies, the website is safe to browse, and I rated it favorably on these 3 other criteria.
4
I agree with the other posters, this site has been marked as unsafe by people who have a political agenda against this site. This is against the spirit of what WOT is to be used for, damages the reputation of WOT, and is awfully immature.
3
this site shares views from historical religious and social views.
1
shares philosophical views from several centuries old periods.
1
The site is safe, unless your political leanings cannot tolerate conservatives or their opinions.
3
This is a political site, and it strongly leans conservative; so liberals have been marking it as dangerous. It is a safe site.
7
The people who attack this website have a political axe to grind. This website is safe for browsing and should not be classified as malicious.
6
This organisation evidently functions as a malicious propaganda machine targeting American citizens. See *****
4
Prüfen Sie, ob Sie kompromittiert wurdenVerbinden Sie sich mit Google, um Ihren Browserverlauf zu scannen.
Mit Google verbinden
Gesehen bei
Mit Ihrer Anmeldung stimmen Sie der Datenerfassung und -nutzung zu, wie sie in unserer Nutzungsbedingungen und Datenschutzrichtlinie
alternative-placeholder

Über WOT

Wir haben mehr als 2 Millionen Websites überprüft, Tendenz steigend. WOT ist eine leichtgewichtige Erweiterung, mit der Sie schnell und sicher surfen können. Es bereinigt Ihren Browser, beschleunigt ihn und schützt Ihre privaten Daten.

Ist das Ihre Website?

Melden Sie Ihre Website an, um Zugang zu WOTs Business-Tools zu erhalten und mit Ihren Kunden in Kontakt zu treten.
Diese Website beanspruchen
Diese Website verwendet Cookies für Analysezwecke und zur Personalisierung. Indem Sie fortfahren, erklären Sie sich mit unseren Cookie-Richtlinie.
Akzeptieren