Безопасен ли johnlocke.org?

Доверено WOT

Оценка безопасности веб-сайта

53%
Оценка безопасности WOT основана на нашей уникальной технологии и отзывах экспертов сообщества.
Этот сайт заявлен?
Нет
Обзоры сообщества
★ 3.1
Алгоритм WOT
62%
безопасность для детей
Нет

Что говорит сообщество?

Оставить отзыв

Как бы вы оценили этот сайт от 1 до 5?
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
Поделитесь своим отзывом и помогите сообществуВ отзывах должно быть не менее 15 символов.Выберите теги, которые лучше всего описывают этот сайт
Вредоносное ПО или вирусы
Низкое качество обслуживания
Фишинг
Мошенничество
Потенциально незаконное
Некорректный или неэтичный контент
Риск для конфиденциальности
Подозрительный сайт
Разжигание ненависти, дискриминация
Спам
Потенциально нежелательная программа
Реклама / Pop-ups
Для взрослых
Случайное обнажение
Шокирующий контент
Отмена
Опубликовать обзор
3.1
starstarstarempty-starempty-star

На основе 17 отзывов

Сортировать по:
Новые
This site has good information.
Полезный
I am beginning to get fed up with the negative ratings on WOT based solely on political biases. The people who have rated the John Locke Foundation as Hate and discrimination are themselves being discriminatory against other political philosophies.
1
people that disagree with the study results lie about the web site. nothing new about that.
Полезный
Once a again political troll has downmarkt this site. Nothing wrong with it. You don't hav to agree with its philosophy but that's no reason to mark it down.
Полезный
Founded in 1990, The John Locke Foundation employs research, journalism, and outreach programs to transform government through competition, innovation, personal freedom, and personal responsibility. JLF seeks a better balance between the public sector and private institutions of family, faith, community, and enterprise.
Полезный
@nehouik -- The 97% statistic you quote is made up (no one really knows what an accurate %, as surveys have been self-selected), but you're certainly welcome to your opinion, and I appreciate that you at least took the time to explain your rating. Unfortunately, many of the low ratings in Reliability, Privacy, and Child Safety are just bogus trolling. Too bad, as it's lowering the value of WOT when people do this.
2
This site is safe. They don't phish or collect data or any other type of untrustworthy activity. Do not downgrade a site just because you don't agree with them philosophically. That's childish.
3
Some of these 'political' ratings make WOT a less useful tool. More, it seems, every day... :(
2
The John Locke Foundation is a conservative think tank. They are no where close to being malicious or hateful. They represent conservative/libertarian values and any bad ratings here are from liberal hackers.
3
A reminder of what the categories mean : - Trustworthiness indicates the general level of trust that the users have towards a web site. - Vendor reliability shows the level of trust for business transactions on a website, especially in e-commerce. - Privacy measures the level of trust for protecting users’ privacy. - Child safety signals the level of trust for the site’s suitability for children. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I rated poorly the Trustworthiness not because of ideological opposition to it but because this website/group uses lies to actively mislead their readers and gain support to advocate measures favorable to their corporate supporters. If you read a few comments down from this one, the user "NotBuyingIt" included a link regarding JLF's anti-global-warming propaganda. Anthropogenic (man-made) Global Warming is not a political claim but a scientific one supported by 97% of scientists and it is endorsed as a scientific fact by all major scientific organizations, including NAS, AAAS, NASA, and IPCC. Aside from this corporate-backed propaganda supported by lies, the website is safe to browse, and I rated it favorably on these 3 other criteria.
4
I agree with the other posters, this site has been marked as unsafe by people who have a political agenda against this site. This is against the spirit of what WOT is to be used for, damages the reputation of WOT, and is awfully immature.
3
this site shares views from historical religious and social views.
1
shares philosophical views from several centuries old periods.
1
The site is safe, unless your political leanings cannot tolerate conservatives or their opinions.
3
This is a political site, and it strongly leans conservative; so liberals have been marking it as dangerous. It is a safe site.
7
The people who attack this website have a political axe to grind. This website is safe for browsing and should not be classified as malicious.
6
This organisation evidently functions as a malicious propaganda machine targeting American citizens. See *****
4
Проверьте, не были ли вы скомпрометированыПодключитесь к Google, чтобы просмотреть историю просмотров.
Войти с помощью Google
Как видно на
Выполняя вход, вы соглашаетесь на сбор и использование данных, как описано в нашем Условия использования и Политика конфиденциальности
alternative-placeholder

О приложении

Мы просмотрели более 2 миллионов веб-сайтов, и их число продолжает расти. WOT — это легкое расширение, разработанное, чтобы помочь вам быстро и безопасно просматривать веб-страницы. Он очистит ваш браузер, ускорит его работу и защитит вашу личную информацию.

Это ваш сайт?

Заявите права на свой веб-сайт, чтобы получить доступ к бизнес-инструментам WOT и связаться с вашими клиентами.
Заявить об этом веб-сайте
Этот сайт использует файлы cookie для анализа и персонализации. Продолжая использование сайта, вы соглашаетесь с нашей политикой в отношении файлов cookie.
Принять