Is ihr.org Safe?

This site is suspicious

2.1
starstarempty-starempty-starempty-star
(64 Reviews)
Claim this site
Share:
Share your thoughts...
K
starempty-star
Poor
starempty-star
Fair
starempty-star
Average
starempty-star
Good
starempty-star
Excellent
64 Reviews by the community
Sort by:
Newest
The most trustworthy online protection
n
a site hated by the hordes at service of the diabolic globalist oligarchs, enough said for all that know a little bit about the dark times we are living (the darkest hour coming just before the 2nd coming of our Saviour)
Helpful
·
Report
No "hate" present in the whole site.
Helpful
·
Report
j
2 years ago
Nothing wrong
Helpful
·
Report
a
5 years ago
Full of Holocaust denial and anti-semitism
Helpful
·
Report
5 years ago
Antisemitic and Holocaust denial website.
Helpful
·
Report
M
5 years ago
Provides historical documents. Some have rated site down because they don't like what those documents reveal. History not found in USA textbooks. Explore with an open mind.
1
·
Report
i
5 years ago
Revisionist site containing pro-nazi and pro-fascist propaganda
1
·
Report
R
5 years ago
This is for people who want more than a one sided coin. Expressed opinions are generally well documented. If we all think alike, nobody is thinking and we all can be exploited.
1
·
Report
C
6 years ago
Site may offend some because of strong views.  But site is safe without viruses, trojans, etc.
Helpful
·
Report
p
6 years ago
This site shows the other side/extreme of historical interpretations. Like all interpretations of history, enjoy with a grain of salt.
Helpful
·
Report
t
6 years ago
who gave this a bad rating. this is a website about history that is long forgotten. stop reading your damn textbooks and start going to the library, reading news articles, and independent media!
Helpful
·
Report
6 years ago
A site of dubious intent, dubious honesty, and dubious sanity. Its content is skewed and contrived, its evidence is fabricated, and its rhetoric is empty. This site is an ideological danger which endorses so-called "historical revisionism" when in reality, they promote Holocaust denial, antisemitism, and obscurantist refactorings of historical events to fit within their own deluded agenda. I wouldn't trust anything that comes from this site. The positive reviews here are obviously apologists who try to defend this sort of egregious bullshit. Don't fall for such crap. This site is as accurate as the Creation Museum or Urban Dictionary.
Helpful
·
Report
B
6 years ago
Historical documents - newspaper articles - after WWII showing Japan offered to end the war & this was rebuffed by US. This is controversial as the US went on to fire bomb Japan & drop the two atomic bombs.
Helpful
·
Report
m
6 years ago
There is nothing wrong with this site, unless you need to keep your head buried in the sand. It is hard for some to learn their world view has been a fiction, and it's not for everyone.
Helpful
·
Report
b
6 years ago
Poor customer experience as it is a far-right neo-nazi site to disseminate faux information about the Holocaust. It's entire function is Holocaust denial, and its claims have been proven wrong and dishonest. Avoid like the plague. At least Wikipedia is reliably written in the main.
Helpful
·
Report
o
6 years ago
A bunch of butt-hurt people don't like this site because of the content. No other reason. If it offends you, don't look at it.
Helpful
·
Report
P
6 years ago
I suspect a degree of "astroturfing" is going on here from those ideologically committed to a specific world-view. on a subject a emotive as Israel and the Middle-East - especially when religion rears its head - you are going to get emotional people protesting vigorously that their cherished concepts are being attacked. this makes it all the more important that criticism - cold, calm, reasoned, objective criticism - should have a place in the debate. i do suspect emotive evangelists like Dr Mike Evans are leading people by the nose, using information selectively, and placing undue emphasis on contentious interpretations of scripture and church doctrine, to put forward the idea that there is only ONE permissible Christian stance on Israel. This is fallacious and wrong. you can hold Christian beliefs and still be critical of the State of Israel and what it does.
Helpful
·
Report
W
6 years ago
I see not problem with children reading this due to their lack of understanding of world events. It might be good for parents to describe some of the horrors of war with their children. Men do bad things to other people. As for Holocaust Denial this is ABSURD. Holocaust is a generic term and not only attributable to anit-Semitic acts of aggression but to any ethnic cleansing or crimes against humanity in a large scale. I suppose the US fire bombing of Dresden was deserved by the civilian population? Or the nuclear bombing of Hiroshima? As for trustworthy the author has used sources rather than innuendo or opinion so I do justify my rating. I am sorry for others who feel their world view is being challenge. That is democracy!
1
·
Report
F
6 years ago
Ya, it's "hateful" or "discriminatory" or "antisemitic" anytime anything critical of Zionism or Judaism is uttered by anyone. What a crock. There's nothing wrong with the site or hateful about it. Moreover it investigates a critical aspect of WWII that has gone ignored.
1
·
Report
y
7 years ago
This site provides a controversial viewpoint, but gives references and citations for all its information. Reading the other comments, it appears that many have voted down this site because of personal political or religious bias, which is a shame as it decreases the value of WOT.
Helpful
·
Report
«
123
...
4
»

About this site

The IHR, an independent, public interest history research and publishing center, seeks to promote peace and freedom through greater awareness of the past.

Trustworthiness
42
/100
Child Safety
41
/100
This site uses cookies for analytics and personalised content. By continuing to browse this site, you agree to our cookies policy
Accept