Безопасен ли ihr.org?

This site is a source of contrived disinformation regarding the holocaust against Jews and even the merits (?) of Nazism, not to mention some of the evangelical nonsense regarding the destiny of Israel, however I also note some articles that are merely critical of Israeli influence in American politics, which is a legitimate topic of concern. This site is problematic as being a source of information, therefore awareness of these problems is advised before perusing this site. See: *****

A site of dubious intent, dubious honesty, and dubious sanity. Its content is skewed and contrived, its evidence is fabricated, and its rhetoric is empty. This site is an ideological danger which endorses so-called "historical revisionism" when in reality, they promote Holocaust denial, antisemitism, and obscurantist refactorings of historical events to fit within their own deluded agenda. I wouldn't trust anything that comes from this site. The positive reviews here are obviously apologists who try to defend this sort of egregious bullshit. Don't fall for such crap. This site is as accurate as the Creation Museum or Urban Dictionary.

Poor customer experience as it is a far-right neo-nazi site to disseminate faux information about the Holocaust. It's entire function is Holocaust denial, and its claims have been proven wrong and dishonest. Avoid like the plague. At least Wikipedia is reliably written in the main.

I suspect a degree of "astroturfing" is going on here from those ideologically committed to a specific world-view. on a subject a emotive as Israel and the Middle-East - especially when religion rears its head - you are going to get emotional people protesting vigorously that their cherished concepts are being attacked. this makes it all the more important that criticism - cold, calm, reasoned, objective criticism - should have a place in the debate. i do suspect emotive evangelists like Dr Mike Evans are leading people by the nose, using information selectively, and placing undue emphasis on contentious interpretations of scripture and church doctrine, to put forward the idea that there is only ONE permissible Christian stance on Israel. This is fallacious and wrong. you can hold Christian beliefs and still be critical of the State of Israel and what it does.

I see not problem with children reading this due to their lack of understanding of world events. It might be good for parents to describe some of the horrors of war with their children. Men do bad things to other people. As for Holocaust Denial this is ABSURD. Holocaust is a generic term and not only attributable to anit-Semitic acts of aggression but to any ethnic cleansing or crimes against humanity in a large scale. I suppose the US fire bombing of Dresden was deserved by the civilian population? Or the nuclear bombing of Hiroshima? As for trustworthy the author has used sources rather than innuendo or opinion so I do justify my rating. I am sorry for others who feel their world view is being challenge. That is democracy!

Ya, it's "hateful" or "discriminatory" or "antisemitic" anytime anything critical of Zionism or Judaism is uttered by anyone. What a crock. There's nothing wrong with the site or hateful about it. Moreover it investigates a critical aspect of WWII that has gone ignored.

This site provides a controversial viewpoint, but gives references and citations for all its information. Reading the other comments, it appears that many have voted down this site because of personal political or religious bias, which is a shame as it decreases the value of WOT.