Le site conservapedia.com est-il sûr ?

Site web suspect

Score de sécurité du site web

27%
Le score de sécurité de WOT est basé sur notre technologie unique et sur les avis des experts de la communauté.
Ce site est-il revendiqué ?
Non
Avis de la Communauté
★ 1.6
L'algorithme de WOT
32%
Sécurité pour les Enfants
N/A

Que dit la communauté ?

Laisser un commentaire

Quelle note entre 1 et 5 donneriez-vous à ce site ?
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
Faites part de vos commentaires et aidez la communautéLes commentaires doivent comporter au moins 15 caractèresChoisissez les tags qui décrivent le mieux ce site web
Logiciels malveillants ou virus
Mauvais service client
Hameçonnage
Escroquerie
Potentiellement illégal
Fallacieux ou contraire à l’éthique
Risques relatifs à la confidentialité
Suspect
Haine, discrimination
Escroquerie
Programme potentiellement indésirable
Publicités / fenêtres pop-up
Contenu pour adultes
Nudité accidentelle
Violent ou choquant
Annuler
Publier le commentaire
1.6
starhalf-starempty-starempty-starempty-star

Basé sur 616 avis

Classer par :
Le plus récent
Such a poor and hate filled site that just brings down the IQ of anyone who goes on it.
Utile
Even though the wiki is biased (to be expected with a title like Conservapedia), don't let your personal opinions get in the way of ratings. This site is perfectly fine, and is useful for some scholarly projects.
Utile
This site has been wrongfully and maliciously attacked by a coordinated effort of individuals associated with one or more leftist websites. WOT should consider filters that would adequately categorize and group together ratings and comments from people acting in concert, whether for or against a specific site based on ideological orientation. The WOT ratings system is being unnecessarily co-opted by the mob, and this is is an emerging problem in the WOT ratings system.
Utile
Perfectly finesite that is being systematically defamed by the left
Utile
Creationist psuedoscience.
2
the ratings should be based on the technical merits of the sight not on opinions about the content
1
WOT isn't for trashing websites with whose opinions you differ; it's for flagging sites that may harbor viruses, malware, etc. Use it correctly, please. You folks really need to calm down and let other opinions exist. Geez.
Utile
I found this site to be very informative and interesting. I guess if you're not a Christian Conservative, you'll dump it and run! But, if you like information that is conservative in nature, more republican by party, and fits in with "middle America," then you'll be pleased with this site! All depends upon how you lean and what you're looking for or expecting. It fits right in with many of us who are looking for the other side of the coin!
Utile
Freedom of speech; according to the Liberals, they think they can abuse their WOT to classify Conservative sites as "hate-speech", but their basing sites are so "Accepting and tolerant". Wow.
Utile
Young Earth creationist propaganda and disinformation site masquerading as an encyclopaedia.
2
Presents politically-motivated ideological positions as fact.
2
No trackers, no beacons, nothing wrong with this site. Only a few Orwellian Book-burners who are looking to change History and the meaning of words. -What a shame that Web Of Trust has been compromised by a few people with too much time on their hands.
Utile
This is a reputable conservative web site. WOT has been bombarded by liberal hate mongers who have nothing better to do than try to ruin the reputation of those with whom they disagree. Accepting ratings and hate comments from these people actually harms the integrity of WOT.
Utile
A handbook for the paranoid and delusional.
2
The evident intolerance of those who cannot abide 'conservative' views getting an airing is seen in the negative comments below. Do we live in a tolerant society or not?
Utile
Unverified articles presented as TRUE and HONEST™. Some frickin' encyclopedia.
1
The website is not dangerous in any way that I am aware of; no malware, no pop-ups, no links to unsafe websites, no scamming. However, it is heavily biased and presents a lot of inaccurate or untrue information as factual. Although it promotes itself as a "trustworthy" encyclopaedia, factual truth is to them secondary to pushing their own agenda. My recommendation: check the website for yourselves, as there is no danger to your computer in doing so. But take everything you read with a grain of salt.
1
Site is trustworthy and does not track information or link to malicious sites, but is filled with false information and hate speech. Not recommended for children.
2
Contains lies, defamatory information, hate speech, delusions and clearly incorrect statements. Presents all this as "trustworthy", and uses a wiki-like presentation style that is intentionally misleading. Stay away!
3
just a bunch of pissed off atheists bashing this site... there should be some way to regulate this crap.
Utile
1415161718
...
31
Vérifiez si vous avez été compromisConnectez-vous à Google pour analyser votre historique de navigation.
Se connecter avec Google
Tel que vu sur
En vous connectant, vous acceptez la collecte et l'utilisation des données telles qu'elles sont décrites dans notre site web. Conditions d'utilisation et Politique de Confidentialité
alternative-placeholder

À propos de WOT

Nous avons passé en revue plus de 2 millions de sites web et ce n'est pas fini. WOT est une extension légère conçue pour vous aider à naviguer rapidement et en toute sécurité. Il nettoie votre navigateur, l'accélère et protège vos informations privées.

C'est votre site ?

Réclamez votre site web pour accéder aux outils commerciaux de WOT et entrer en contact avec vos clients.
Réclamer ce site
Ce site utilise des cookies à des fins d'analyse et de personnalisation. En continuant, vous acceptez notre politique en matière de cookies.
Accepter