18+
Ce site est réservé aux adultes
18+

Le site conservapedia.com est-il sûr ?

Ce site est suspect

1.6
starhalf-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
(621 avis)
Je détiens ce site
Demander à notre communauté
Partager :
Partagez votre avis...
starempty-star
Mauvais
starempty-star
Correct
starempty-star
Moyen
starempty-star
Bon
starempty-star
Excellent
621 avis dans la communauté
Classer par :
Le plus récent
La protection en ligne la plus fiable
9 févr. 2012
starstarstarempty-starempty-star
Site is trustworthy and does not track information or link to malicious sites, but is filled with false information and hate speech. Not recommended for children.
Utile
2
9 févr. 2012
Contains lies, defamatory information, hate speech, delusions and clearly incorrect statements. Presents all this as "trustworthy", and uses a wiki-like presentation style that is intentionally misleading. Stay away!
Utile
3
5 févr. 2012
starstarstarstarstar
just a bunch of pissed off atheists bashing this site... there should be some way to regulate this crap.
Utile
1 févr. 2012
LOL...ALL of the spooky guy George Soros zombies are posting false accusations about this site. You know a web site is posting articles that are based on facts when these zombies come out in droves to try and scare people away. Anyway, this site is clean as a whistle@@ Nothing to see here that is bad for your PC's health but dead spooky guy George Soros zombies.
Utile
27 janv. 2012
This site functions as a place to read articles about conservative American political opinions, just as one would likely infer by the URL. No problems.
Utile
2
24 janv. 2012
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
Hate speech and false data
Utile
2
24 janv. 2012
starstarstarempty-starempty-star
While I disagree with most of the content on this site, I thimk it is a mistake tan s a discedit to WOT's principles to give it a bad rating.
Utile
1
21 janv. 2012
starstarstarstarstar
very useful
Utile
14 janv. 2012
starstarstarstarstar
Ignore all the haters' comments here. If their ire at bias was consistent, they'd be perpetually busy rating infinitely more sites that slant their content they way they apparently prefer.
Utile
8 janv. 2012
starstarstarstarstar
An encyclopedia from a conservative point of view. Those who rate this site as harmful are just silly liberals who hate others opinions.
Utile
5 janv. 2012
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
Hateful site oriented to the extreme right. They unfairly permanently lock popular articles so as to ensure the propagation of a certain POV.
Utile
1
2 janv. 2012
starstarstarhalf-starempty-star
Using WOT to censor viewpoint sucks. If I and other conservatives were to do this to liberal sites such as DailyKos.com, we'd be guilty of using WOT to enforce our viewpoint. There is nothing about this site that contains hate speech or "phishing" -- which is an attempt to drive traffic to a site presenting malware. Depending upon your political viewpoint, you might view the data presented as false, but I've seen far worse on some liberal sites. I remember when the libs tried to WOT out michellemalkin.com and her subsidiary site hotair.com -- it didn't work.
Utile
30 déc. 2011
starstarstarstarstar
The site accurately reflects the views of many conservatives. Obviously, liberals strongly disagree with these views, but it is unfair to call it a scram or hateful unless you also would say the same about sites like HuffPo and MoveOn.
Utile
26 déc. 2011
starstarstarstarstar
I notice no one gives bad ratings to the opposite versions of this like liberalpedia and rationalpedia. Seems like political and religious motivated and triggered responses.
Utile
25 déc. 2011
starstarstarstarstar
WOT needs to crack down on political spammers. This site is 100% safe and informative if opinionated. While I don't claim to agree with everything on this site and identify as a Moderate,It is definitely not the WiKKKi that people claim it is. The whole "Gays are good people and can ditch destructive behavior and be happier" articles hardly qualify as hate speech and the articles about Theology are actually pretty insightful. It's a Conservative Wiki. Don't like it form a Liberal Wiki or a Moderate Wiki. The whole spam thing and "Awareness Campaign" by the Far-Far Left just smacks of thought crime to me. When did it become okay to let Neo-Nazis hold rallies in Skokie but bad for people to gather together to discuss their sincerely held beliefs in a peaceful forum? Maybe you should try engaging in dialog with them and try to come together in a noble exchange of ideas... Never mind just call them idiot rednecks and whine about how Political discourse is so uncivil.
Utile
13 déc. 2011
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
Hateful content, what else is to say !
Utile
2
8 déc. 2011
I've only looked at a few articles, on unions and socialism, and found them to be generally accurate and helpful. I am not a conservative but feel that should not affect my judgment of the site. I am particularly concerned with the reviews that charge it with "phishing or other cams" -- I see no evidence of that at all. There may be more biased articles than the ones I saw, but this is not a simply ideological one-dimensional site.
Utile
7 déc. 2011
starstarstarstarstar
Website contains no malicious links or software, as far as I can find.
Utile
7 déc. 2011
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
Lies.
Utile
2
5 déc. 2011
False information.
Utile
2
«
161718
...
32
»

À propos de ce site

Indice de Confiance
32
/100
Sécurité pour les Enfants
35
/100
This site uses cookies for analytics and personalised content. By continuing to browse this site, you agree to our cookies policy
Accept