Le site conservapedia.com est-il sûr ?
Site web suspect
Score de sécurité du site web
27%
Ce site est-il revendiqué ?
Non
Avis de la Communauté
★ 1.6
L'algorithme de WOT
32%
Sécurité pour les Enfants
N/A
Que dit la communauté ?
Laisser un commentaire
Faites part de vos commentaires et aidez la communautéLes commentaires doivent comporter au moins 15 caractèresChoisissez les tags qui décrivent le mieux ce site web
Logiciels malveillants ou virus
Mauvais service client
Hameçonnage
Escroquerie
Potentiellement illégal
Fallacieux ou contraire à l’éthique
Risques relatifs à la confidentialité
Suspect
Haine, discrimination
Escroquerie
Programme potentiellement indésirable
Publicités / fenêtres pop-up
Contenu pour adultes
Nudité accidentelle
Violent ou choquant
Annuler
Publier le commentaire
1.6
Basé sur 616 avis
Classer par :
Le plus récent
Prejudiced, paranoid, misinforming propaganda. Not just anti-science but anti-common sense.
1
Some topics on here are as biased are outlandish and derogatory. However I read some articles that I have background knowledge on and I felt that the ones I did read were for the most part unbiased, and contain factual information. (I'm actually surprised they painted Canada in a decent light) But the articles like the one on Gay marriage was full of hate speech. I'd keep this a interesting tool to see opposing views. As far as I could tell no security issues.
1
There is nothing harmful to your computer on this site. WOT users should refrain from letting their personal opinion of website material influence their ratings, lest they nullify the system. Start your own personal opinion rating system if you want to rate a site bad based solely on whether you agree with the content or not. Leave WOT for what it was designed for, to help protect people from spyware, malware, viruses, etc
25
I don't understand why some of the ratings are poor for this site. I have found nothing hateful or deceitful on this site, nor have I found any phishing or other types of computer attacks from this server.
11
This is a good site as far as safety goes. There certainly will be ideological differences, but that will will not harm your computer.
5
It's a disgusting hate site dedicated to hateful views and an anti-science perspective. Unfortunately it's no joke.
Utile
This is not a bad site. The only people that give it negative votes are atheist trolls that are just trying to censor things they don't agree with.
Utile
Good site for conservatives and others able to entertain the conservative perspective and method.
1
Interesting site for reading on conservative views, but not all facts are accurate.
3
Excellent site. Much more dependable than Wikipedia. There is nothing "hateful" or inaccurate about the contents of this site. It is reprehensible that bad ratings are being given to this site simply because it is U.S. conservative. Those ratings are pure leftist propaganda.
Utile
This site is harmless. While this site is anti-science, it does not deserve "red" ratings as if it were a porn site, infested with malware, commercially dishonest or containing poisoned links. "Poor" ratings must not be used just because one disagrees with a site's religious views.
1
Brainwashing and extreme right, anti-scientific bias. Children shouldn't see sites like this, it's hard enough to educate without this sort of drivel being touted as truth.
Utile
This sight is extremely Biased and very unreliable for information. Most of it is false
Utile
A different point of view. No hate noticed.
1
This site seems to contain several half-truths specifically designed to deceive its reader. Strongly NOT recommended.
Utile
It's a great site. Don't believe all the insane liberals.
3
People don't like it cause it differs from their opinion. Safe site!
25
Nothing wrong with reading what other people think. It's all up to you if you agree or not.
2
People give the site bad marks simply because it clashes with their point of view. Is it really a surprise which side of the aisle this website caters to? Condemning something because it is bias and conflicts with personal viewpoints is, ironically, an inherently biased action.
Utile
If WOT does not monitor the accuracy of it's ratings then it is useless to me. This sites poor ratings seem to be based purely on political bias. I really can live without another so called service shoving leftism in my face. I'm very disappointed...
Utile
1819202122
...
31Vérifiez si vous avez été compromisConnectez-vous à Google pour analyser votre historique de navigation.En vous connectant, vous acceptez la collecte et l'utilisation des données telles qu'elles sont décrites dans notre site web. Conditions d'utilisation et Politique de Confidentialité
Se connecter avec Google
Tel que vu sur
À propos de WOT
Nous avons passé en revue plus de 2 millions de sites web et ce n'est pas fini. WOT est une extension légère conçue pour vous aider à naviguer rapidement et en toute sécurité. Il nettoie votre navigateur, l'accélère et protège vos informations privées.C'est votre site ?
Réclamez votre site web pour accéder aux outils commerciaux de WOT et entrer en contact avec vos clients.Réclamer ce site
Installer WOTCe site utilise des cookies à des fins d'analyse et de personnalisation. En continuant, vous acceptez notre politique en matière de cookies.
Accepter