Le site johnlocke.org est-il sûr ?

La confiance de WOT

Score de sécurité du site web

53%
Le score de sécurité de WOT est basé sur notre technologie unique et sur les avis des experts de la communauté.
Ce site est-il revendiqué ?
Non
Avis de la Communauté
★ 3.1
L'algorithme de WOT
62%
Sécurité pour les Enfants
N/A

Que dit la communauté ?

Laisser un commentaire

Quelle note entre 1 et 5 donneriez-vous à ce site ?
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
Faites part de vos commentaires et aidez la communautéLes commentaires doivent comporter au moins 15 caractèresChoisissez les tags qui décrivent le mieux ce site web
Logiciels malveillants ou virus
Mauvais service client
Hameçonnage
Escroquerie
Potentiellement illégal
Fallacieux ou contraire à l’éthique
Risques relatifs à la confidentialité
Suspect
Haine, discrimination
Escroquerie
Programme potentiellement indésirable
Publicités / fenêtres pop-up
Contenu pour adultes
Nudité accidentelle
Violent ou choquant
Annuler
Publier le commentaire
3.1
starstarstarempty-starempty-star

Basé sur 17 avis

Classer par :
Le plus récent
This site has good information.
Utile
I am beginning to get fed up with the negative ratings on WOT based solely on political biases. The people who have rated the John Locke Foundation as Hate and discrimination are themselves being discriminatory against other political philosophies.
1
people that disagree with the study results lie about the web site. nothing new about that.
Utile
Once a again political troll has downmarkt this site. Nothing wrong with it. You don't hav to agree with its philosophy but that's no reason to mark it down.
Utile
Founded in 1990, The John Locke Foundation employs research, journalism, and outreach programs to transform government through competition, innovation, personal freedom, and personal responsibility. JLF seeks a better balance between the public sector and private institutions of family, faith, community, and enterprise.
Utile
@nehouik -- The 97% statistic you quote is made up (no one really knows what an accurate %, as surveys have been self-selected), but you're certainly welcome to your opinion, and I appreciate that you at least took the time to explain your rating. Unfortunately, many of the low ratings in Reliability, Privacy, and Child Safety are just bogus trolling. Too bad, as it's lowering the value of WOT when people do this.
2
This site is safe. They don't phish or collect data or any other type of untrustworthy activity. Do not downgrade a site just because you don't agree with them philosophically. That's childish.
3
Some of these 'political' ratings make WOT a less useful tool. More, it seems, every day... :(
2
The John Locke Foundation is a conservative think tank. They are no where close to being malicious or hateful. They represent conservative/libertarian values and any bad ratings here are from liberal hackers.
3
A reminder of what the categories mean : - Trustworthiness indicates the general level of trust that the users have towards a web site. - Vendor reliability shows the level of trust for business transactions on a website, especially in e-commerce. - Privacy measures the level of trust for protecting users’ privacy. - Child safety signals the level of trust for the site’s suitability for children. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I rated poorly the Trustworthiness not because of ideological opposition to it but because this website/group uses lies to actively mislead their readers and gain support to advocate measures favorable to their corporate supporters. If you read a few comments down from this one, the user "NotBuyingIt" included a link regarding JLF's anti-global-warming propaganda. Anthropogenic (man-made) Global Warming is not a political claim but a scientific one supported by 97% of scientists and it is endorsed as a scientific fact by all major scientific organizations, including NAS, AAAS, NASA, and IPCC. Aside from this corporate-backed propaganda supported by lies, the website is safe to browse, and I rated it favorably on these 3 other criteria.
4
I agree with the other posters, this site has been marked as unsafe by people who have a political agenda against this site. This is against the spirit of what WOT is to be used for, damages the reputation of WOT, and is awfully immature.
3
this site shares views from historical religious and social views.
1
shares philosophical views from several centuries old periods.
1
The site is safe, unless your political leanings cannot tolerate conservatives or their opinions.
3
This is a political site, and it strongly leans conservative; so liberals have been marking it as dangerous. It is a safe site.
7
The people who attack this website have a political axe to grind. This website is safe for browsing and should not be classified as malicious.
6
This organisation evidently functions as a malicious propaganda machine targeting American citizens. See *****
4
Vérifiez si vous avez été compromisConnectez-vous à Google pour analyser votre historique de navigation.
Se connecter avec Google
Tel que vu sur
En vous connectant, vous acceptez la collecte et l'utilisation des données telles qu'elles sont décrites dans notre site web. Conditions d'utilisation et Politique de Confidentialité
alternative-placeholder

À propos de WOT

Nous avons passé en revue plus de 2 millions de sites web et ce n'est pas fini. WOT est une extension légère conçue pour vous aider à naviguer rapidement et en toute sécurité. Il nettoie votre navigateur, l'accélère et protège vos informations privées.

C'est votre site ?

Réclamez votre site web pour accéder aux outils commerciaux de WOT et entrer en contact avec vos clients.
Réclamer ce site
Ce site utilise des cookies à des fins d'analyse et de personnalisation. En continuant, vous acceptez notre politique en matière de cookies.
Accepter