conservapedia.comは安全ですか？
疑わしいウェブサイト
ウェブサイトのセキュリティスコア
27%
このウェブサイトは申請済みですか?
いいえ
コミュニティレビュー
★ 1.6
WOTのアルゴリズム
32%
子供の安全性
該当なし
コミュニティは何と言っていますか?
レビューを残す
フィードバックを共有してコミュニティに貢献しましょうレビューは少なくとも15文字で構成されている必要がありますこのウェブサイトを最もよく表すタグを選択してください
マルウェアあるいはウイルス
顧客サービスが悪い
フィッシング
詐欺
違法の可能性がある
誤解を招くあるいは倫理に反している
プライバシーリスク
不審
憎悪、差別的
スパム
潜在的に迷惑なプログラム
広告/ポップアップ
アダルトコンテンツ
卑猥な可能性がある
残酷あるいは刺激的
キャンセル
レビューの投稿
1.6
616のレビューに基づく
並び順：
最新
Prejudiced, paranoid, misinforming propaganda. Not just anti-science but anti-common sense.
1
Some topics on here are as biased are outlandish and derogatory. However I read some articles that I have background knowledge on and I felt that the ones I did read were for the most part unbiased, and contain factual information. (I'm actually surprised they painted Canada in a decent light) But the articles like the one on Gay marriage was full of hate speech. I'd keep this a interesting tool to see opposing views. As far as I could tell no security issues.
1
There is nothing harmful to your computer on this site. WOT users should refrain from letting their personal opinion of website material influence their ratings, lest they nullify the system. Start your own personal opinion rating system if you want to rate a site bad based solely on whether you agree with the content or not. Leave WOT for what it was designed for, to help protect people from spyware, malware, viruses, etc
25
I don't understand why some of the ratings are poor for this site. I have found nothing hateful or deceitful on this site, nor have I found any phishing or other types of computer attacks from this server.
11
This is a good site as far as safety goes. There certainly will be ideological differences, but that will will not harm your computer.
5
It's a disgusting hate site dedicated to hateful views and an anti-science perspective. Unfortunately it's no joke.
役立つ
This is not a bad site. The only people that give it negative votes are atheist trolls that are just trying to censor things they don't agree with.
役立つ
Good site for conservatives and others able to entertain the conservative perspective and method.
1
Interesting site for reading on conservative views, but not all facts are accurate.
3
Excellent site. Much more dependable than Wikipedia. There is nothing "hateful" or inaccurate about the contents of this site. It is reprehensible that bad ratings are being given to this site simply because it is U.S. conservative. Those ratings are pure leftist propaganda.
役立つ
This site is harmless. While this site is anti-science, it does not deserve "red" ratings as if it were a porn site, infested with malware, commercially dishonest or containing poisoned links. "Poor" ratings must not be used just because one disagrees with a site's religious views.
1
Brainwashing and extreme right, anti-scientific bias. Children shouldn't see sites like this, it's hard enough to educate without this sort of drivel being touted as truth.
役立つ
This sight is extremely Biased and very unreliable for information. Most of it is false
役立つ
A different point of view. No hate noticed.
1
This site seems to contain several half-truths specifically designed to deceive its reader. Strongly NOT recommended.
役立つ
It's a great site. Don't believe all the insane liberals.
3
People don't like it cause it differs from their opinion. Safe site!
25
Nothing wrong with reading what other people think. It's all up to you if you agree or not.
2
People give the site bad marks simply because it clashes with their point of view. Is it really a surprise which side of the aisle this website caters to? Condemning something because it is bias and conflicts with personal viewpoints is, ironically, an inherently biased action.
役立つ
If WOT does not monitor the accuracy of it's ratings then it is useless to me. This sites poor ratings seem to be based purely on political bias. I really can live without another so called service shoving leftism in my face. I'm very disappointed...
役立つ
1819202122
...
31
WOTをインストールするこのサイトでは分析とパーソナライズのために Cookie を使用しています。 続行すると、当社の クッキーポリシー。
受け入れる