conservapedia.comは安全ですか?

疑わしいウェブサイト

ウェブサイトのセキュリティスコア

27%
WOT のセキュリティ スコアは、当社独自のテクノロジーとコミュニティの専門家によるレビューに基づいています。
このウェブサイトは申請済みですか?
いいえ
コミュニティレビュー
★ 1.6
WOTのアルゴリズム
32%
子供の安全性
該当なし

コミュニティは何と言っていますか?

レビューを残す

このウェブサイトを1から5の間で、どのように評価しますか?
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
フィードバックを共有してコミュニティに貢献しましょうレビューは少なくとも15文字で構成されている必要がありますこのウェブサイトを最もよく表すタグを選択してください
マルウェアあるいはウイルス
顧客サービスが悪い
フィッシング
詐欺
違法の可能性がある
誤解を招くあるいは倫理に反している
プライバシーリスク
不審
憎悪、差別的
スパム
潜在的に迷惑なプログラム
広告/ポップアップ
アダルトコンテンツ
卑猥な可能性がある
残酷あるいは刺激的
キャンセル
レビューの投稿
1.6
starhalf-starempty-starempty-starempty-star

616のレビューに基づく

並び順:
最新
Vladimir Jaffe under attack via astroturfing due to his anti-socialist, pro-capitalist opinions. Having grown up in the USSR, he understands how the system works, politely explains it to those who don't, with easily verifiable facts to back up his arguments.
役立つ
Some people hate consertive website for fear of exposing lies. This site is fine.
役立つ
One of the BEST, The Liberal Obama fanatics have falsely reported this website as bad but this site is SUPER with GREAT info.
役立つ
It seems like the political left equate conservatism to hate. It is an unjust measure regarding information contained on this website. The real hate is coming from those intolerant the conservative point of view.
役立つ
I won't usually give a site negative ratings *simply* because of what the content is, and I'm not doing that here. I created an account on this site in order to ask that one word be changed in order to make the discussion more fair and factual. The result was that my comment was removed and my account blocked for two years. This isn't how a true Wiki-type website should operate, and so I post this warning here.
1
Content on the Conservapedia is all cited and can be verified. There is no hate, no discrimination, nothing misleading nor unethical. The site also includes a debate section. Here there are opinions and disagreements among the participants, but that is what makes a healthy debate.
役立つ
This site has ZERO untrustworthy content, adult content, or other content consistent with WOT negative ratings. All stories cite sources and are accurate.
役立つ
Progressives flag all websites that present an opinion differing from the current PC group think as "intolerant", "hateful" "discriminatory", "suspicious","inflammatory", "misleading", "unethical", "homophobic, "Islamophobic", etc... This merely quashes ALL discourse. Why are those who allegedly champion free speech the MOST intolerant of true free speech and an exchange of ideas? Absolutely, NOTHING wrong with this website.
役立つ
Great site. Its a shame people on the left give this site a bad reputation and try to sensor it.
役立つ
This site is by no means a satire. The people claiming that the site is satire are merely trying to play off the sites hateful agenda as a joke. The site was started by Andrew Schlafly a neo-conservative evangelical christian zionist. The site and its admins view the statements they make on the site to be true or maybe they're knowingly lying, in either case, the site promotes hatred and genocide against all non-white non-european non-christian non-zionists of the world.
役立つ
Nothing wrong with this site that I can see. Once again, the other side has taken it upon themselves to trash a site that would put out an opposite opinion from theirs. These people need to GET OVER IT!! We are not all blind sheep following a deceitful master. Some of us prefer to have the opportunity to read/hear the truth and think for ourselves.
役立つ
A pot of insanity where you'll find page after page of discrimination based on belief, sexual orientation and political orientation. You will also find ludicrous statements and contortions of basic science, such as the word "radar" is "Conservative" and calling the theory of relativity "liberal claptrap"
1
The site contains Christian hateful propaganda.
1
Very Bias UN-educated propaganda filled website geared towards enticing extremism in America
1
Good site and does not promote hate. I'm sick of WOT and its false information.
役立つ
Difficult to tell if this site is a legitimate somewhat-extreme organization, a satire site, or a front for libel/slander. If the latter, it could be a good example of a moderately skilled psychological operation.
1
Objections to this website can be expected based upon worldview, but it is neither unreliable nor unsuitable.
役立つ
a good conservative website,i think it's suitable for every kid around the world,to save them from the "liberal" illiberalism education.
役立つ
Freedom of Speech, people! Just because you disagree with their political stance is no reason to give it a untrustworthy rating. I wouldn't go to a liberal website and give it an untrustworthy rating rating and calling it a hate group, I would just avoid it. Apparently common sense has gone out the window.
役立つ
Wow, I see and have experienced nothing wrong with this site. The only reason people hate it is because they don't agree with it and are biased against it. Such people should stick to their own liberal websites.
役立つ
7891011
...
31
侵害されていないか確認するGoogle に接続して閲覧履歴をスキャンします。
Google と接続
掲載されているもの
サインインすることで、当社の定めるデータ収集と使用に同意したことになります。 利用規約 及び 個人情報保護方針
alternative-placeholder

WOT について

私たちは 200 万以上のウェブサイトをレビューしました。 WOT は、迅速かつ安全にブラウジングできるように設計された軽量拡張機能です。 ブラウザをクリーンアップし、速度を上げ、個人情報を保護します。

これはあなたのウェブサイトですか?

ウェブサイトを申請して、WOT のビジネス ツールにアクセスし、顧客とつながりましょう。
このウェブサイトを連携する
このサイトでは分析とパーソナライズのために Cookie を使用しています。 続行すると、当社の クッキーポリシー。
受け入れる