conservapedia.com é seguro?

Less hate-filled than obviously bias-embracing. The ethical concern has to do with misrepresentation. I don't here refer to the veracity of their claims. Rather, I refer to the fact that the site bills itself as a source for information on a variety of topics. In fact, each article I have read can only be described honestly as nothing short of propaganda.

A user gets indef-blocked for this constructive post (which references a valid edit made by an admin): http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Best_New_Conservative_Words&diff=758634&oldid=758359 They are also known to copy-paste articles with non-existent attribution: ***** - and the copies are done by "high-ranking members". The site is so fundamentalist that you might as well think it's a joke.

The site is very poorly run. It is common for administrators to censor dissenting opinions and post very inaccurate, badly sourced material. I have seen one administrator post the locations of dissenters publicly. While the site is safe, it is not good to use or get information from.

Filthy site full of pages like "Homosexuality and Bestiality". Supportive of Scientology. Also highly blasphemous as it seeks to rewrite the Bible for its own uses. Not Safe For Children, Not Safe For Work, Not Safe For Christians. Avoid like the plague.

FIrst off this is not a hate site, people claming this is a hateful site or bad site did not read the disclaimer http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:General_disclaimer a moderator needs to fix the useless comments on this page #1 CONSERVAPEDIA MAKES NO GUARANTEE OF VALIDITY; USE ENTIRELY AT YOUR OWN RISK for all the ***** fact ALL WIKI's including wikipedia give this disclaimer!!!

An absolutely disgusting, pathetic site for extremist right propaganda. Examples: http://www.conservapedia.com/Homosexuality, http://www.conservapedia.com/Al_Gore, http://www.conservapedia.com/Rosa_Luxemburg, http://www.conservapedia.com/Atheism, http://www.conservapedia.com/Abortion, sadly, the list goes on. They even contact the FBI about vandals, which should be illegal! IF ANYTHING, AND I MEAN ANYTHING, DON'T PRETEND IT'S A RESOURCE FOR CHILDREN! IT MAY BRAINWASH THEM!

Sick and tired of seeing conservative sites maligned by libs on WOT. As far as I'm concerned this calls into question the trustworthiness and reliability of WOT itself. Is WOT going to allow itself to be used as a form of mind control and censorship? block/warn against all the conservative sites out there? This is BS.

This is a conservative alternative to Wikipedia. People are abusing WOT to attack it with libel. There is no SPAM, Phishing or other scams, or Adult Content. This is not a matter of debate but fact. As for the claims of "Hateful, violent or illegal content", and "Ethical issues" , these are communist thugs trying to silence any opposition.

This is not a hate site. Read its stuff with a grain of salt like you would any other wiki based encyclopedia - including wikipedia. High bias is ok on the internet, yah morons. If you don't agree with it, move on. I rated this site highly as it suits its purpose just fine without being a scan, phishing, being libel, etc.