conservapedia.com é seguro?

it really goes to show the leaning of this service when this site has a worse rating than refusefascism.org. nothing else to say but it's an alternative wikipedia. just cause you don't like it doesn't mean it's automatically terrible. like hate and discrimination? gruesome and shocking? this isn't a fair system and i don't understand entirely why people have to lie about a service to get people off of a site they don't like.

Conservapedia is an amazingly objective dictionary that provides realistic, unbiased definitions in their proper context. The people giving it negative ratings are part of the privileged group of people that are not use to their world being presented in a realistic way so I would pay no mind to their ratings. If you want a proper history and definition of any event, I would recommend Conservapedia BIGLY!

DOESN'T REPRESENT TRUE CONSERVATISM I'm as conservative as they come but this site contains an awful lot of misinformation and flat-out absurdity. Very extreme opinions. Definitely doesn't represent most Conservatives, maybe a small fraction of the most extreme. Even RationalWiki, which has a very strong and obvious liberal bias, is more reliable than this. But my advice just stick to Wikipedia.

A bastion of conservative views. Conservapedia does openly admit that it is primarily a conservative view on things, which is fine, but expect an obvious bias, of course. The reason why there is such a negative rating here is due to unfair, malicious brigading by left-leaning users, who are attempting to portray the site as untrustworthy, despite when sites such as Wikipedia are guilty of obvious censorship and bias.