Поделитесь своим мнением...
Плохо
Нормально
Средне
Хорошо
Отлично
621 отзывов
Сортировать по:
Новые
Самая надежная онлайн-защита
5 июля 2013 г.
This site gives a conservative political view of various subjects that tend to incite people to filter the matter through their own social-cultural-political point of view. Finding a site that does this, while reining in unfriendliness and poor taste, is a rarity. The very name of this site announces a viewpoint, which is that the view of the so-called "main stream" information sites, including that *other* on-line encyclopedia (which is, of course, much more complete) are not in the "main stream" or "middle of the road", and certainly not unbiased, but just as in other public media, overloaded with hard-left leaning contributors (this is a natural occurrence, repeated over-and-over in our world, and is not due to conspiracy). Therefore, when visiting this site, expect such views, but this site seems free from low blows and nasty discourse. It is a good site, and for conservatives is an oasis in the desert. If you don't agree with it, then you owe it to yourself to explore how other people of good character happen to come to different views than your own. That's what makes for a more peaceful social milieu.
J
24 июня 2013 г.
Calling this site "another point of view" and things like that is just grossly inaccurate. They make up facts and it has an extreme bias with pretty much every single word.
They call E=MC*2 "liberal claptrap". Need I really say more?
I really hope this site is satire
j
9 июня 2013 г.
bad ratings are from homosexuals,atheist and liberals who hate Conservatives
30 мая 2013 г.
This site is full of hate, bigotry and Fox News type fanatics. The American jingoism is so thick here, you can cut it with a knife. Not to be trusted.
H
27 мая 2013 г.
It only took me seconds to realise that this site is full of false info and brainwashing. Come on, evolution syndrome?
I can't tell if this is a really massive parody site or really a christian hate machine, but whatever you do, do not take ANYTHING from that site for truth.
e
17 мая 2013 г.
Anti-science. Anti-intelligence.
17 мая 2013 г.
This is a conservative site, which has been blacklisted by many malicious liberals.
W
3 мая 2013 г.
Hateful content
and Racists+ propaganda
l
30 апр. 2013 г.
Duh! The title of this site makes its conservative point of crystal clear! Clearly, The negative comments are from SOME closed minded liberal readers. I applaud the liberal readers who respectfully disagree without trashing the ratings. I find the information to be usefull, researched and conservative. Why do SOME people (on both sides) try to censor and discredit views that don't agree with theirs? They offer no facts, rational thought, reason or basis for slamming this site. To them, the earth is still flat because they don't like Columbus and suspect he was "a conservative". Why come to a conservative site if you don't want a conservative view? I respect your right to disagree. But PLEASE bring some factual thought and substance. Make a contribution. Bring your reasoning and values, Instead of lifting your leg, marking your territory and obstructing access to this site. Concept: Please act civil.
22 апр. 2013 г.
Guys, guys...
It's a joke.
Get over it.
Seriously.
15 апр. 2013 г.
In many respects, this website isn't a conservative wiki, but instead, a reactionary one. It seems to support some of the lower end creationist sites, and advocates an aggressive disdain for atheism that strikes me as inappropriate for trying to reach out to someone, but quite appropriate for egotistical debating. One of the more popular articles is titled "Comedy and satires concerning atheism and evolution."
That said, I haven't encountered any viruses, and there's actually a great deal less explicit content than there is in wikipedia (as you would expect in a 'conservative' site)
Also, its better to take what they say with a grain of salt than simply avoid the site. I've found a fair amount of information (which I verified elsewhere) that couldn't be found in any other site I've yet encountered. The site used to have a yellow rating, and if WOT offered that in comments, I would think it the most appropriate.
15 апр. 2013 г.
Site presents data without the liberal bias so evident in sites like Snopes and Wikipedia, which are completely unreliable. Contradicts incorrect or unproven information regarding "scientific" theories and evolutionary hogwash.
As an independent, thinking person, it's nice to have an information source devoid of the usual liberal brainwashing so prevalent in the world today.
Although I believe this regarding this site, my comments illustrate how political opinion is being used to sway the way people view certain web-sites rather than objective answers to the criteria specified by WOT. Liberal trolls need to stop mis-using the WOT rating system.
9 апр. 2013 г.
This site has a radically different viewpoint than most of the world, so use with caution.
k
2 апр. 2013 г.
I can't believe the childishness of the liberal mindset. This site is accurate and in no way deserves the negative ratings that it has been given. I may not agree with moveon.org, but I certainly would not try to discredit them with an inaccurate rating on web of trust. If you don't like the point of view expressed, moveon.org.
1 апр. 2013 г.
Christian or atheist, liberal or conservative, you all can vouch for this website. It did not infect you with malware. Therefore, it is fine by me. And in times when a democrat President is killing this country by taxing and spending, you can't go wrong looking up what the media won't tell you.
b
1 апр. 2013 г.
this site is a terrible source of information there is mostly incorrect or unproven information and highly biased against scientific facts and evolution.
31 мар. 2013 г.
Simply a conservative right-wing version of Encyclopedia Dramatic. Don't hate because of a different point of view.
31 мар. 2013 г.
There is nothing on this site that is dangerous to your computer or privacy (no spam, malicious software, phishing, etc). Because one may be offended by its content does not make it untrustworthy. All have a right to their opinion and should be able to express it freely on a website.
28 мар. 2013 г.
No red or green dots here. The writing is creative and easy to read. Some of the opinions run counter to my own, but I firmly believe in Freedom of Speech (even on the Internet!).
27 мар. 2013 г.
'Comment votes have been disabled for this site.' says it all really.
«
101112...
32»
О сайте
Благонадёжность
32
/100безопасность для детей
35
/100
This site uses cookies for analytics and personalised content. By continuing to browse this site, you agree to our cookies policy
Accept