Site is trustworthy and does not track information or link to malicious sites, but is filled with false information and hate speech. Not recommended for children.
Contains lies, defamatory information, hate speech, delusions and clearly incorrect statements.
Presents all this as "trustworthy", and uses a wiki-like presentation style that is intentionally misleading.
Stay away!
LOL...ALL of the spooky guy George Soros zombies are posting false accusations about this site. You know a web site is posting articles that are based on facts when these zombies come out in droves to try and scare people away. Anyway, this site is clean as a whistle@@ Nothing to see here that is bad for your PC's health but dead spooky guy George Soros zombies.
This site functions as a place to read articles about conservative American political opinions, just as one would likely infer by the URL. No problems.
Ignore all the haters' comments here. If their ire at bias was consistent, they'd be perpetually busy rating infinitely more sites that slant their content they way they apparently prefer.
Using WOT to censor viewpoint sucks. If I and other conservatives were to do this to liberal sites such as DailyKos.com, we'd be guilty of using WOT to enforce our viewpoint. There is nothing about this site that contains hate speech or "phishing" -- which is an attempt to drive traffic to a site presenting malware. Depending upon your political viewpoint, you might view the data presented as false, but I've seen far worse on some liberal sites.
I remember when the libs tried to WOT out michellemalkin.com and her subsidiary site hotair.com -- it didn't work.
The site accurately reflects the views of many conservatives. Obviously, liberals strongly disagree with these views, but it is unfair to call it a scram or hateful unless you also would say the same about sites like HuffPo and MoveOn.
I notice no one gives bad ratings to the opposite versions of this like liberalpedia and rationalpedia.
Seems like political and religious motivated and triggered responses.
WOT needs to crack down on political spammers.
This site is 100% safe and informative if opinionated.
While I don't claim to agree with everything on this site and identify as a Moderate,It is definitely not the WiKKKi that people claim it is. The whole "Gays are good people and can ditch destructive behavior and be happier" articles hardly qualify as hate speech and the articles about Theology are actually pretty insightful. It's a Conservative Wiki. Don't like it form a Liberal Wiki or a Moderate Wiki. The whole spam thing and "Awareness Campaign" by the Far-Far Left just smacks of thought crime to me. When did it become okay to let Neo-Nazis hold rallies in Skokie but bad for people to gather together to discuss their sincerely held beliefs in a peaceful forum? Maybe you should try engaging in dialog with them and try to come together in a noble exchange of ideas... Never mind just call them idiot rednecks and whine about how Political discourse is so uncivil.
I've only looked at a few articles, on unions and socialism, and found them to be generally accurate and helpful. I am not a conservative but feel that should not affect my judgment of the site. I am particularly concerned with the reviews that charge it with "phishing or other cams" -- I see no evidence of that at all. There may be more biased articles than the ones I saw, but this is not a simply ideological one-dimensional site.