Безопасен ли conservapedia.com?

Some topics on here are as biased are outlandish and derogatory. However I read some articles that I have background knowledge on and I felt that the ones I did read were for the most part unbiased, and contain factual information. (I'm actually surprised they painted Canada in a decent light) But the articles like the one on Gay marriage was full of hate speech. I'd keep this a interesting tool to see opposing views. As far as I could tell no security issues.

There is nothing harmful to your computer on this site. WOT users should refrain from letting their personal opinion of website material influence their ratings, lest they nullify the system. Start your own personal opinion rating system if you want to rate a site bad based solely on whether you agree with the content or not. Leave WOT for what it was designed for, to help protect people from spyware, malware, viruses, etc

Excellent site. Much more dependable than Wikipedia. There is nothing "hateful" or inaccurate about the contents of this site. It is reprehensible that bad ratings are being given to this site simply because it is U.S. conservative. Those ratings are pure leftist propaganda.

This site is harmless. While this site is anti-science, it does not deserve "red" ratings as if it were a porn site, infested with malware, commercially dishonest or containing poisoned links. "Poor" ratings must not be used just because one disagrees with a site's religious views.

People give the site bad marks simply because it clashes with their point of view. Is it really a surprise which side of the aisle this website caters to? Condemning something because it is bias and conflicts with personal viewpoints is, ironically, an inherently biased action.