According to some of the ex-admins, the admins are either trolls who consider this a joke or genuinely mentally ill.
The articles are also attack centered, for an example the article on "Evolution" focuses on the people involved, and not on evolution itself.
also really, an entire article dedicated to pictures of atheists who are fat
Clearly a site dedicated to the truth. Truth is typically lambasted by those forces for which it is an impediment to their aspirations of evil and to those to stupid to be able to see the truth for what it is. If you rate this site as having a poor reputation, it only reflects on your own poor reputation. Those who seek and therefore know the truth will not be put off by your childish attempts to hide it.
Some topics on here are as biased are outlandish and derogatory. However I read some articles that I have background knowledge on and I felt that the ones I did read were for the most part unbiased, and contain factual information. (I'm actually surprised they painted Canada in a decent light) But the articles like the one on Gay marriage was full of hate speech. I'd keep this a interesting tool to see opposing views. As far as I could tell no security issues.
There is nothing harmful to your computer on this site. WOT users should refrain from letting their personal opinion of website material influence their ratings, lest they nullify the system. Start your own personal opinion rating system if you want to rate a site bad based solely on whether you agree with the content or not. Leave WOT for what it was designed for, to help protect people from spyware, malware, viruses, etc
I don't understand why some of the ratings are poor for this site. I have found nothing hateful or deceitful on this site, nor have I found any phishing or other types of computer attacks from this server.
Excellent site. Much more dependable than Wikipedia. There is nothing "hateful" or inaccurate about the contents of this site. It is reprehensible that bad ratings are being given to this site simply because it is U.S. conservative. Those ratings are pure leftist propaganda.
This site is harmless. While this site is anti-science, it does not deserve "red" ratings as if it were a porn site, infested with malware, commercially dishonest or containing poisoned links. "Poor" ratings must not be used just because one disagrees with a site's religious views.