18+
Сайт для лиц 18 лет и старше
18+

Безопасен ли conservapedia.com?

Это подозрительный сайт

1.6
starhalf-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
(621 отзывов)
Заявить права на сайт
Задать вопрос сообществу
Поделиться:
Поделитесь своим мнением...
starempty-star
Плохо
starempty-star
Нормально
starempty-star
Средне
starempty-star
Хорошо
starempty-star
Отлично
621 отзывов
Сортировать по:
Новые
Самая надежная онлайн-защита
13 июля 2011 г.
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
According to some of the ex-admins, the admins are either trolls who consider this a joke or genuinely mentally ill. The articles are also attack centered, for an example the article on "Evolution" focuses on the people involved, and not on evolution itself. also really, an entire article dedicated to pictures of atheists who are fat
Полезный
1
10 июля 2011 г.
starstarstarstarhalf-star
NOT a hate site as others proclaim....God forbid we have a conservative point of view instead of the kool-aid drinkers on the left barraging us 24/7 on the media!
Полезный
3
6 июля 2011 г.
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
Is this some sort of joke?
Полезный
30 июня 2011 г.
starstarstarstarempty-star
Clearly a site dedicated to the truth. Truth is typically lambasted by those forces for which it is an impediment to their aspirations of evil and to those to stupid to be able to see the truth for what it is. If you rate this site as having a poor reputation, it only reflects on your own poor reputation. Those who seek and therefore know the truth will not be put off by your childish attempts to hide it.
Полезный
3
29 июня 2011 г.
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
Prejudiced, paranoid, misinforming propaganda. Not just anti-science but anti-common sense.
Полезный
1
28 июня 2011 г.
starstarhalf-starempty-starempty-star
Some topics on here are as biased are outlandish and derogatory. However I read some articles that I have background knowledge on and I felt that the ones I did read were for the most part unbiased, and contain factual information. (I'm actually surprised they painted Canada in a decent light) But the articles like the one on Gay marriage was full of hate speech. I'd keep this a interesting tool to see opposing views. As far as I could tell no security issues.
Полезный
1
27 июня 2011 г.
There is nothing harmful to your computer on this site. WOT users should refrain from letting their personal opinion of website material influence their ratings, lest they nullify the system. Start your own personal opinion rating system if you want to rate a site bad based solely on whether you agree with the content or not. Leave WOT for what it was designed for, to help protect people from spyware, malware, viruses, etc
Полезный
25
26 июня 2011 г.
I don't understand why some of the ratings are poor for this site. I have found nothing hateful or deceitful on this site, nor have I found any phishing or other types of computer attacks from this server.
Полезный
11
23 июня 2011 г.
starstarstarstarhalf-star
This is a good site as far as safety goes. There certainly will be ideological differences, but that will will not harm your computer.
Полезный
5
22 июня 2011 г.
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
It's a disgusting hate site dedicated to hateful views and an anti-science perspective. Unfortunately it's no joke.
Полезный
12 июня 2011 г.
starstarstarstarstar
This is not a bad site. The only people that give it negative votes are atheist trolls that are just trying to censor things they don't agree with.
Полезный
12 июня 2011 г.
starstarstarstarstar
Good site for conservatives and others able to entertain the conservative perspective and method.
Полезный
1
7 июня 2011 г.
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
Interesting site for reading on conservative views, but not all facts are accurate.
Полезный
3
4 июня 2011 г.
Excellent site. Much more dependable than Wikipedia. There is nothing "hateful" or inaccurate about the contents of this site. It is reprehensible that bad ratings are being given to this site simply because it is U.S. conservative. Those ratings are pure leftist propaganda.
Полезный
30 мая 2011 г.
starstarstarhalf-starempty-star
This site is harmless. While this site is anti-science, it does not deserve "red" ratings as if it were a porn site, infested with malware, commercially dishonest or containing poisoned links. "Poor" ratings must not be used just because one disagrees with a site's religious views.
Полезный
1
23 мая 2011 г.
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
Brainwashing and extreme right, anti-scientific bias. Children shouldn't see sites like this, it's hard enough to educate without this sort of drivel being touted as truth.
Полезный
20 мая 2011 г.
This sight is extremely Biased and very unreliable for information. Most of it is false
Полезный
30 апр. 2011 г.
starstarstarstarempty-star
A different point of view. No hate noticed.
Полезный
1
25 апр. 2011 г.
This site seems to contain several half-truths specifically designed to deceive its reader. Strongly NOT recommended.
Полезный
24 апр. 2011 г.
starstarstarstarstar
It's a great site. Don't believe all the insane liberals.
Полезный
3
«
192021
...
32
»

О сайте

Благонадёжность
32
/100
безопасность для детей
35
/100
This site uses cookies for analytics and personalised content. By continuing to browse this site, you agree to our cookies policy
Accept