Безопасен ли googlesyndication.com?

Доверено WOT

Оценка безопасности веб-сайта

66%
Оценка безопасности WOT основана на нашей уникальной технологии и отзывах экспертов сообщества.
Этот сайт заявлен?
Нет
Обзоры сообщества
★ 3.5
Алгоритм WOT
69%
безопасность для детей
69%

Что говорит сообщество?

Оставить отзыв

Как бы вы оценили этот сайт от 1 до 5?
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
Поделитесь своим отзывом и помогите сообществуВ отзывах должно быть не менее 15 символов.Выберите теги, которые лучше всего описывают этот сайт
Вредоносное ПО или вирусы
Низкое качество обслуживания
Фишинг
Мошенничество
Потенциально незаконное
Некорректный или неэтичный контент
Риск для конфиденциальности
Подозрительный сайт
Разжигание ненависти, дискриминация
Спам
Потенциально нежелательная программа
Реклама / Pop-ups
Для взрослых
Случайное обнажение
Шокирующий контент
Отмена
Опубликовать обзор
3.5
starstarstarhalf-starempty-star

На основе 29 отзывов

Сортировать по:
Новые
Poor site, as noted by the trustworthy source: "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/StevenBlack/hosts/master/hosts"
1
Official Google Inc Domain - safe and trusted
Полезный
The topmost comment said he/she thinks people are overacting. Well, I got nothing against sites getting revenue, even profit over what they need to keep the site running. That's fine, but first of all I use NoScript because I don't want any unnecessary scripts running. I also only accept what AdBlock Plus Non-Intrusive Ad's campaign defines acceptable - I have that disabled though, simply because I've never clicked and ad on web and never will, so even those would be waste of space. But even when I had the allowed, I knew those ads don't need scripts to run - and in fact googles ad service is pretty flawed code wise if it can't handle showing ads without scripting. But the MAIN POINT: It's not just innocent advertising. It's online tracking, profiling, etc. etc. - and that makes it totally untrustworthy for me. As for suitability for children - no, I don't think internet ads are such things. And when it comes to google, I have in fact set NoScripts more advanced feature, ABE (Application Boundary Enforcement) to have very strict rules for various google owned sites for which domains are allowed to contact them. So if this site to contact facebook (ok, I have similar, but even more strict rules for facebook), although noscript menu shows ***** allowed, the ABE rules allow any cross site contacts to facebook domains only from those facebook domains themselves - this ensures facebook works, but no other sites attempt to contact facebook for scripts (or whatever) fails - and it's blocked so deep inside firefox it's kinda firewall, the site will never know the browser blocks the connection - it only attempts to make one and doesn't get a reply. I only explained the facebook thing because it was easier to provide actual case example, and the reasons why I treat google and facebook this way are same - they practice tracking and profiling, and they sell the profiling data to 3rd parties as well, if it wasn't bad enough already. Block this domain, it's unnecessary and harmful.
4
This subdomain is owned and operated by Google.
Полезный
Funny all these fake MyWOT accounts to note, for good, this site (often a Rookie accounts with one comment or several comments that this site is the first (or the first few) comments in this accounts). ============================================ Anti-privacy links, ads, tracking, ....... OWNER: ***** GOOGLE
2
What happened when Google visited this site? Of the ***** pages we tested on the site over the past 90 days, 8 page(s) resulted in malicious software being downloaded and installed without user consent. The last time Google visited this site was on 2014-10-26, and the last time suspicious content was found on this site was on ***** Malicious software includes 1054 scripting exploit(s), 137 trojan(s), 5 backdoor(s). Malicious software is hosted on 57 domain(s), including monetate.net/, douglas.de/, ***** This site was hosted on 3 network(s) including AS15169 (GOOGLE), AS36040 (YOUTUBE), AS16509 (AMAZON-02). Has this site acted as an intermediary resulting in further distribution of malware? Over the past 90 days, googlesyndication.com appeared to function as an intermediary for the infection of 15 site(s) including discprevcessciisu67.land.ru/, lohanesdistphk55.land.ru/, ***** Has this site hosted malware? Yes, this site has hosted malicious software over the past 90 days. It infected 1 domain(s), including ***** Next steps:
2
I think everyone is overacting, googlesyndication.com is a javascript deploy by Google Adsense to display ads on websites. Site owners and administrators use this in order to keep their site running and generate revenue.
4
There are a few reasons for my rating. Firstly, this domain is owned by Google, which makes it fairly poor in terms of privacy. Moreover, when trying to access this site, you are instantly redirected to Google's search page, which is strange. Apparently, we're not supposed to see what's there. Lastly, googlesyndication.com is an advert site, which would be another reason to avoid it. If you have Firefox, use NoScript to block it. If you don't, get it as this and many other sites make it worth it.
5
Trying to go to the website "googlesyndication.com" redirects to <https://www.google.com/>. That, in and of itself, makes the site suspicious. Child safety is the responsibility of the parent or guardian. No child should be left alone while online. Those that voted that a business website is safe for children are, I hope, not parents.
4
Used for distributing and show popups and online tracking.
3
Fairly safe, but what use is it to a user? What happened when Google visited this site? Of the 13953 pages we tested on the site over the past 90 days, 0 page(s) resulted in malicious software being downloaded and installed without user consent. The last time Google visited this site was on 2013-02-14, and the last time suspicious content was found on this site was on ***** Malicious software includes 1 trojan(s). This site was hosted on 100 network(s) including AS15169 (Google Internet Backbone), AS43515 (Bandaid GT), AS13999 (Mega Cable, S.A. de C.V.). Has this site acted as an intermediary resulting in further distribution of malware? Over the past 90 days, googlesyndication.com appeared to function as an intermediary for the infection of 2 site(s) including nanopress.it/, *****
4
Privacy tracker with cookies to create popups, rogues, and unsafe sites under the banner of "customized advertising"...
3
Wordpress compromised site
4
It just redirects to google whats the problem?
2
Official Google Inc, website.
2
Site is located in the US and answerable to US authorities. Unsafe because of US breaches of the rule of law, in particular with respect to Habeas corpus.
3
Redirects to www.google.com.
3
Tracks user's browsing / browsing habits / profiling re: ***** DNS: http://www.robtex.com/dns/googlesyndication.com.html
10
Գուգլը ունի կայքերի մի մեծ շարան, սա դրանցից մեկն է
1
12
Проверьте, не были ли вы скомпрометированыПодключитесь к Google, чтобы просмотреть историю просмотров.
Войти с помощью Google
Как видно на
Выполняя вход, вы соглашаетесь на сбор и использование данных, как описано в нашем Условия использования и Политика конфиденциальности
alternative-placeholder

О приложении

Мы просмотрели более 2 миллионов веб-сайтов, и их число продолжает расти. WOT — это легкое расширение, разработанное, чтобы помочь вам быстро и безопасно просматривать веб-страницы. Он очистит ваш браузер, ускорит его работу и защитит вашу личную информацию.

Это ваш сайт?

Заявите права на свой веб-сайт, чтобы получить доступ к бизнес-инструментам WOT и связаться с вашими клиентами.
Заявить об этом веб-сайте
Этот сайт использует файлы cookie для анализа и персонализации. Продолжая использование сайта, вы соглашаетесь с нашей политикой в отношении файлов cookie.
Принять