Le site googlesyndication.com est-il sûr ?

The topmost comment said he/she thinks people are overacting. Well, I got nothing against sites getting revenue, even profit over what they need to keep the site running. That's fine, but first of all I use NoScript because I don't want any unnecessary scripts running. I also only accept what AdBlock Plus Non-Intrusive Ad's campaign defines acceptable - I have that disabled though, simply because I've never clicked and ad on web and never will, so even those would be waste of space. But even when I had the allowed, I knew those ads don't need scripts to run - and in fact googles ad service is pretty flawed code wise if it can't handle showing ads without scripting. But the MAIN POINT: It's not just innocent advertising. It's online tracking, profiling, etc. etc. - and that makes it totally untrustworthy for me. As for suitability for children - no, I don't think internet ads are such things. And when it comes to google, I have in fact set NoScripts more advanced feature, ABE (Application Boundary Enforcement) to have very strict rules for various google owned sites for which domains are allowed to contact them. So if this site to contact facebook (ok, I have similar, but even more strict rules for facebook), although noscript menu shows ***** allowed, the ABE rules allow any cross site contacts to facebook domains only from those facebook domains themselves - this ensures facebook works, but no other sites attempt to contact facebook for scripts (or whatever) fails - and it's blocked so deep inside firefox it's kinda firewall, the site will never know the browser blocks the connection - it only attempts to make one and doesn't get a reply. I only explained the facebook thing because it was easier to provide actual case example, and the reasons why I treat google and facebook this way are same - they practice tracking and profiling, and they sell the profiling data to 3rd parties as well, if it wasn't bad enough already. Block this domain, it's unnecessary and harmful.

Funny all these fake MyWOT accounts to note, for good, this site (often a Rookie accounts with one comment or several comments that this site is the first (or the first few) comments in this accounts). ============================================ Anti-privacy links, ads, tracking, ....... OWNER: ***** GOOGLE

What happened when Google visited this site? Of the ***** pages we tested on the site over the past 90 days, 8 page(s) resulted in malicious software being downloaded and installed without user consent. The last time Google visited this site was on 2014-10-26, and the last time suspicious content was found on this site was on ***** Malicious software includes 1054 scripting exploit(s), 137 trojan(s), 5 backdoor(s). Malicious software is hosted on 57 domain(s), including monetate.net/, douglas.de/, ***** This site was hosted on 3 network(s) including AS15169 (GOOGLE), AS36040 (YOUTUBE), AS16509 (AMAZON-02). Has this site acted as an intermediary resulting in further distribution of malware? Over the past 90 days, googlesyndication.com appeared to function as an intermediary for the infection of 15 site(s) including discprevcessciisu67.land.ru/, lohanesdistphk55.land.ru/, ***** Has this site hosted malware? Yes, this site has hosted malicious software over the past 90 days. It infected 1 domain(s), including ***** Next steps:

There are a few reasons for my rating. Firstly, this domain is owned by Google, which makes it fairly poor in terms of privacy. Moreover, when trying to access this site, you are instantly redirected to Google's search page, which is strange. Apparently, we're not supposed to see what's there. Lastly, googlesyndication.com is an advert site, which would be another reason to avoid it. If you have Firefox, use NoScript to block it. If you don't, get it as this and many other sites make it worth it.

Trying to go to the website "googlesyndication.com" redirects to <https://www.google.com/>. That, in and of itself, makes the site suspicious. Child safety is the responsibility of the parent or guardian. No child should be left alone while online. Those that voted that a business website is safe for children are, I hope, not parents.

Fairly safe, but what use is it to a user? What happened when Google visited this site? Of the 13953 pages we tested on the site over the past 90 days, 0 page(s) resulted in malicious software being downloaded and installed without user consent. The last time Google visited this site was on 2013-02-14, and the last time suspicious content was found on this site was on ***** Malicious software includes 1 trojan(s). This site was hosted on 100 network(s) including AS15169 (Google Internet Backbone), AS43515 (Bandaid GT), AS13999 (Mega Cable, S.A. de C.V.). Has this site acted as an intermediary resulting in further distribution of malware? Over the past 90 days, googlesyndication.com appeared to function as an intermediary for the infection of 2 site(s) including nanopress.it/, *****

Tracks user's browsing / browsing habits / profiling re: ***** DNS: http://www.robtex.com/dns/googlesyndication.com.html