18+
This site is for 18+
18+

Is conservapedia.com Safe?

This site is suspicious

1.6
starhalf-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
(621 Reviews)
Claim this site
Ask our community
Share:
Share your thoughts...
starempty-star
Poor
starempty-star
Fair
starempty-star
Average
starempty-star
Good
starempty-star
Excellent
621 Reviews by the community
Sort by:
Newest
The most trustworthy online protection
Apr 9, 2012
starstarstarstarempty-star
It's a a good site who's free speech the fascistic lefties want to silence. WOT is supposed to be about safety not silencing free speech but the left can't seem to stop their hatred for free speech and anyone that disagrees with their fascistic agenda.
Helpful
Apr 8, 2012
People may not agree with it, but it stays within the principles of free speech. To rate this site poorly on what you don't agree with is misleading and unfair.
Helpful
Apr 7, 2012
I don't agree with what this site says, but It is not dangerous in any manner . I'm against censoring site , even if I do not agree with its opinion.
Helpful
Mar 31, 2012
Such a poor and hate filled site that just brings down the IQ of anyone who goes on it.
Helpful
Mar 25, 2012
starstarstarstarstar
Even though the wiki is biased (to be expected with a title like Conservapedia), don't let your personal opinions get in the way of ratings. This site is perfectly fine, and is useful for some scholarly projects.
Helpful
Mar 24, 2012
starstarstarstarstar
This site has been wrongfully and maliciously attacked by a coordinated effort of individuals associated with one or more leftist websites. WOT should consider filters that would adequately categorize and group together ratings and comments from people acting in concert, whether for or against a specific site based on ideological orientation. The WOT ratings system is being unnecessarily co-opted by the mob, and this is is an emerging problem in the WOT ratings system.
Helpful
Mar 13, 2012
starstarstarstarstar
Perfectly finesite that is being systematically defamed by the left
Helpful
Mar 7, 2012
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
Creationist psuedoscience.
Helpful
2
Mar 7, 2012
starstarstarstarhalf-star
the ratings should be based on the technical merits of the sight not on opinions about the content
Helpful
1
Mar 7, 2012
starstarstarstarhalf-star
WOT isn't for trashing websites with whose opinions you differ; it's for flagging sites that may harbor viruses, malware, etc. Use it correctly, please. You folks really need to calm down and let other opinions exist. Geez.
Helpful
Mar 7, 2012
starstarstarstarempty-star
I found this site to be very informative and interesting. I guess if you're not a Christian Conservative, you'll dump it and run! But, if you like information that is conservative in nature, more republican by party, and fits in with "middle America," then you'll be pleased with this site! All depends upon how you lean and what you're looking for or expecting. It fits right in with many of us who are looking for the other side of the coin!
Helpful
starstarstarstarhalf-star
Freedom of speech; according to the Liberals, they think they can abuse their WOT to classify Conservative sites as "hate-speech", but their basing sites are so "Accepting and tolerant". Wow.
Helpful
Mar 4, 2012
Young Earth creationist propaganda and disinformation site masquerading as an encyclopaedia.
Helpful
2
Mar 3, 2012
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
Presents politically-motivated ideological positions as fact.
Helpful
2
Mar 2, 2012
starstarstarstarstar
No trackers, no beacons, nothing wrong with this site. Only a few Orwellian Book-burners who are looking to change History and the meaning of words. -What a shame that Web Of Trust has been compromised by a few people with too much time on their hands.
Helpful
Feb 28, 2012
This is a reputable conservative web site. WOT has been bombarded by liberal hate mongers who have nothing better to do than try to ruin the reputation of those with whom they disagree. Accepting ratings and hate comments from these people actually harms the integrity of WOT.
Helpful
Feb 20, 2012
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
A handbook for the paranoid and delusional.
Helpful
2
Feb 17, 2012
The evident intolerance of those who cannot abide 'conservative' views getting an airing is seen in the negative comments below. Do we live in a tolerant society or not?
Helpful
Feb 12, 2012
Unverified articles presented as TRUE and HONEST™. Some frickin' encyclopedia.
Helpful
1
Feb 10, 2012
starhalf-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
The website is not dangerous in any way that I am aware of; no malware, no pop-ups, no links to unsafe websites, no scamming. However, it is heavily biased and presents a lot of inaccurate or untrue information as factual. Although it promotes itself as a "trustworthy" encyclopaedia, factual truth is to them secondary to pushing their own agenda. My recommendation: check the website for yourselves, as there is no danger to your computer in doing so. But take everything you read with a grain of salt.
Helpful
1
«
151617
...
32
»

About this site

Trustworthiness
32
/100
Child Safety
35
/100
This site uses cookies for analytics and personalised content. By continuing to browse this site, you agree to our cookies policy
Accept