18+
This site is for 18+
18+

Is conservapedia.com Safe?

This site is suspicious

1.6
starhalf-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
(621 Reviews)
Claim this site
Ask our community
Share:
Share your thoughts...
starempty-star
Poor
starempty-star
Fair
starempty-star
Average
starempty-star
Good
starempty-star
Excellent
621 Reviews by the community
Sort by:
Newest
The most trustworthy online protection
Jan 11, 2010
starstarstarstarhalf-star
Sick and tired of seeing conservative sites maligned by libs on WOT. As far as I'm concerned this calls into question the trustworthiness and reliability of WOT itself. Is WOT going to allow itself to be used as a form of mind control and censorship? block/warn against all the conservative sites out there? This is BS.
Helpful
2
Jan 5, 2010
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
Promotes a specific view, at times in contravention of the evidence.
Helpful
Jan 2, 2010
starstarstarstarhalf-star
This is a conservative alternative to Wikipedia. People are abusing WOT to attack it with libel. There is no SPAM, Phishing or other scams, or Adult Content. This is not a matter of debate but fact. As for the claims of "Hateful, violent or illegal content", and "Ethical issues" , these are communist thugs trying to silence any opposition.
Helpful
2
Dec 28, 2009
starstarstarempty-starempty-star
This is not a hate site. Read its stuff with a grain of salt like you would any other wiki based encyclopedia - including wikipedia. High bias is ok on the internet, yah morons. If you don't agree with it, move on. I rated this site highly as it suits its purpose just fine without being a scan, phishing, being libel, etc.
Helpful
3
Dec 26, 2009
This site is quite good, in terms of its humor value, but the sheer amount of bias and hate it displays on a variety of topics renders it a poor mockery of an encyclopedia.
Helpful
Dec 24, 2009
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
Site panders lies and misinformation (such as young-earth creationism, the "Obama is a Muslim" myth, and global warming denialism.) Also has a totalitarian administration.
Helpful
Dec 13, 2009
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
Dedicated to the spread of misinformation, including blatant falsehoods in fields such as biology and geology. Used in an attempt to discredit a valid biological experiment by Dr. Richard Lenski. Additionally, uses misleading statistics and extremely flawed psychology to incite hatred against atheists and homosexuals.
Helpful
Dec 10, 2009
The Qur'an and Bible each have an entry. I'll take a random category from the Bible entry: 10: Humor in the Bible. Let me take one of the four from the Qur'an entry: 4: Verses of Violence. At least there's no liberal bias...
Helpful
Dec 10, 2009
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
hate site
Helpful
Dec 9, 2009
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
Information are given is false... Hateful Site...
Helpful
Dec 9, 2009
starstarstarstarhalf-star
W.O.T. was not made for the purpose of trashing a site because you don't believe in it's views. Ffs grow up and don't be such pansy's
Helpful
1
Dec 9, 2009
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
Wow, how do you cook the facts to boil off the truth? Look at this site. There is such a thing as too far left well this is so far over the right it is off the edge into lala land.
Helpful
Dec 9, 2009
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
This site is hateful, biased, and plays itself off as an "encyclopedia"?! That implies that it will provide truthful information.
Helpful
Nov 20, 2009
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
Extreme bias, not an encyclopedia False information
Helpful
Nov 18, 2009
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
Bending the truth to fit your opinion does not make an encyclopedia.
Helpful
Nov 17, 2009
starstarstarstarstar
The red ratings are simply people with differing political views that are not able to objectively rate a site with which they disagree. There is nothing hateful, illegal, or adult-oriented here.
Helpful
1
Nov 9, 2009
starstarstarstarstar
How is this a hate site? For those of you who automatically rate a site in the red zone whenever it doesn't agree with your point of view, you need to actually READ through several pages before you make your judgment. Didn't elementary school teach you people "don't judge a book by its cover"? Didn't teachers tell you to listen to all the points of view on something before you make your judgment? I am not a Christian. I am an Atheist. But I also am a Conservative, and I believe it's important to preserve freedom of expression on the internet.
Helpful
2
Nov 9, 2009
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
Clearly biased, intellectually dishonest, and pretty worthless as a source of accurate information. It offers little information beyond political, religious, and pseudo science topics, from a deeply (read fanatical) conservative perspective. May appear offensive to some, though some may find it has a non-zero entertainment value. Whatever you make of it, an encyclopedia it is not.
Helpful
Nov 8, 2009
starstarstarhalf-starempty-star
Useless, obviously biased and often untrue, though not nearly as hateful as some other sites and safe in terms of viruses.
Helpful
1
Nov 7, 2009
starstarstarstarstar
Obviously the liberals hate this site, since none of the poor ratings are deserved.
Helpful
7
«
262728
...
32
»

About this site

Trustworthiness
32
/100
Child Safety
35
/100
This site uses cookies for analytics and personalised content. By continuing to browse this site, you agree to our cookies policy
Accept