Is conservapedia.com Safe?

Suspicious website

Website security score

27%
WOT’s security score is based on our unique technology and community expert reviews.
Is this website claimed?
No
Community reviews
★ 1.6
WOT’s algorithm
32%
Child Safety
N/A

What does the community say?

Leave a review

How would you rate this website from 1 to 5?
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
Share your feedback and help the communityReviews must consist of at least 15 charactersChoose the tags that best describe this website
Malware or Viruses
Poor customer service
Phishing
Scam
Potentially illegal
Misleading or unethical
Privacy Risk
Suspicious
Hate, discrimination
Spam
Potential unwanted program
Ads / Pop-ups
Adult Content
Incidental nudity
Gruesome or shocking
Cancel
Post Review
1.6
starhalf-starempty-starempty-starempty-star

Based on 615 reviews

Sort by:
Newest
it really goes to show the leaning of this service when this site has a worse rating than refusefascism.org. nothing else to say but it's an alternative wikipedia. just cause you don't like it doesn't mean it's automatically terrible. like hate and discrimination? gruesome and shocking? this isn't a fair system and i don't understand entirely why people have to lie about a service to get people off of a site they don't like.
Helpful
Conservapedia is filled with almost or everything religious extremism has to offer: sexism, homophobia, anti-science, anti-intellectualism, lies, everything. Has no value whatsoever except to show how dangerous their ideals can be and a good laugh.
Helpful
The site is just filled with christian propaganda.
Helpful
An excellent and extensive web resource.
Helpful
This website does not actually have any issues hate wise, maybe these bad reviews come from others with a different view? Or maybe I didn't see an article? Either way, this is an unbiased review, unlike probably the rest.
Helpful
This website has been downvoted by Liberals who disagree with its content. This tool is not to be used to censor people with differing opinions.
Helpful
Conservapedia is an amazingly objective dictionary that provides realistic, unbiased definitions in their proper context. The people giving it negative ratings are part of the privileged group of people that are not use to their world being presented in a realistic way so I would pay no mind to their ratings. If you want a proper history and definition of any event, I would recommend Conservapedia BIGLY!
Helpful
DOESN'T REPRESENT TRUE CONSERVATISM I'm as conservative as they come but this site contains an awful lot of misinformation and flat-out absurdity. Very extreme opinions. Definitely doesn't represent most Conservatives, maybe a small fraction of the most extreme. Even RationalWiki, which has a very strong and obvious liberal bias, is more reliable than this. But my advice just stick to Wikipedia.
Helpful
I use this app to block scammers not political opinions.
Helpful
Good, informative site. Alernative for left information
Helpful
Opinion site. You don't have to agree, but you don't have to censor.
Helpful
It's not a bad site, it has no viruses, it has no gruesome or shocking content. Stop stroking your ego and rating it low because you hate conservatives.
Helpful
Great site to get the truth from-thumbs up!
Helpful
Christian derp site, disguised as Wikipedia. Dishonest, fraudulent, makes claims long debunked. Avoid.
Helpful
Ridiculous Christian propaganda. Everything it says about science (and reality in general) is wrong. A deliberately misleading and fundamentally biased site. Completely untrustworthy.
Helpful
It's the truth, and it's a nice break from the dominant liberal media establishment.
Helpful
This website's ratings prove you can't have your own opinions unless they are liberal ones.
Helpful
This site is being down rated for political reasons.  The writing is clear, it is not malicious, and its perfectly safe from children.
Helpful
A bastion of conservative views. Conservapedia does openly admit that it is primarily a conservative view on things, which is fine, but expect an obvious bias, of course. The reason why there is such a negative rating here is due to unfair, malicious brigading by left-leaning users, who are attempting to portray the site as untrustworthy, despite when sites such as Wikipedia are guilty of obvious censorship and bias.
Helpful
Truth. Waarheid.
Helpful
23456
...
31
Check If You’ve Been CompromisedConnect with Google to scan your browsing history.
Connect with Google
As seen on
By signing in, you agree to data collection and use as described in our Terms Of Use and Privacy Policy
alternative-placeholder

About WOT

We reviewed more than 2 Million website and counting. WOT is a lightweight extension designed to help you browse quickly and securely. It will clean your browser, speed it up, and protect your private information.

Is this your website?

Claim your website to access WOT’s business tools and connect with your customers.
Claim This Website
This site uses cookies for analytics and personalization. By continuing, you agree to our cookie policy.
Accept