creationwiki.orgは安全ですか？
疑わしいウェブサイト
ウェブサイトのセキュリティスコア
56%
このウェブサイトは申請済みですか?
いいえ
コミュニティレビュー
★ 2.9
WOTのアルゴリズム
58%
子供の安全性
63%
コミュニティは何と言っていますか?
レビューを残す
フィードバックを共有してコミュニティに貢献しましょうレビューは少なくとも15文字で構成されている必要がありますこのウェブサイトを最もよく表すタグを選択してください
マルウェアあるいはウイルス
顧客サービスが悪い
フィッシング
詐欺
違法の可能性がある
誤解を招くあるいは倫理に反している
プライバシーリスク
不審
憎悪、差別的
スパム
潜在的に迷惑なプログラム
広告/ポップアップ
アダルトコンテンツ
卑猥な可能性がある
残酷あるいは刺激的
キャンセル
レビューの投稿
2.9
25のレビューに基づく
並び順：
最新
Good information for Creationist. There is no malware evidenced on the site. False ratings by hateful people. This site posses no threat to your computer.
役立つ
Great informational Site for scientific Information and Truth. Of course it gets denounced and vilified by powerful People that dont want to mankind to know the Truth. Thats why those powerful people pay Workers to write hateful messages about this Site and give it 1 Star.
役立つ
The site is very informative, I would recommend it for all ages.
役立つ
Pseudo-scientific, spreading wrong information, very biased
役立つ
Utterly unscientific and abounding in misinformation, half truths, outright lies. Only allows other creationists to "peer review" it's content. Avoid.
役立つ
Site uses bull-crap pseudoscience to cater to their religious beliefs
1
Много ненаучной и откровенно антинаучной ерунды, высосанной из пальца.
1
Dangerous pseudoscience and outlandish claims
1
Extensive bias toward specific religions, in addition to false claims.
2
Pseudo-scientific, spreading wrong information, very biased.
4
Very good wiki for Creationists to contribute to. I've contributed to Wikipedia, SourceWatch, Citizendium, and Conservapedia in the past. This is considerably less heavy-handed than Wikipedia or Conservapedia. However, it only allows contributions from Creationists, and as such suffers from a lack of contributions. Like any wiki it will be what one makes of it, but I do think the administration at the top is pretty good.
I've provided some excellent sourcing at the following pages, so those claiming it lacks such sourcing haven't examined these areas:
http://creationwiki.org/Transitional_form#Recent_controversies
http://creationwiki.org/Textual_criticism#Biblical_Manuscripts
http://creationwiki.org/Biological_evolution#Rapid_Microevolutionary_rates
http://creationwiki.org/Canopy_theory#Scientific
http://creationwiki.org/Catastrophism#Evidence
http://creationwiki.org/William_Penn
http://creationwiki.org/Barack_Obama
5
"Religious" creationists create lies.
GOd never existed, does not exist, and has "never created anything."
7
Psuedoscientific claims; the site is utter nonsense. The points they raise are all long debunked, evolution is a scientific fact on which all of modern Science relies upon.
8
Lots of pseudoscience. Lots here is presented as true without any scientific research to back any of it up.
8
This is not a scientific site, it a collection of the most appalling lies, quote mining and misrepresentation of facts. If these people supposedly believe in morality, where do they learn that lying is moral?
9
You can't trust creationist sites for real science. These people actively lie or are ignorant of many facts.
9
Same tired and debunked stuff. I wouldn't normally care, but someone less knowledgeable might actually take this stuff seriously.
12
Toilet material
8
Pseudoscience, misleading, lies, quote mining...
10
Gets a lot of even the most basic scientific principles wrong. References cited are misleading.
11
12
WOTをインストールするこのサイトでは分析とパーソナライズのために Cookie を使用しています。 続行すると、当社の クッキーポリシー。
受け入れる