Is junkscience.com Safe?

Name: junkscience.com
Rating: 3.4

Trusted by WOT

Website security score

64%

WOT’s security score is based on our unique technology and community expert reviews.

Is this website claimed?

Community reviews

★ 3.4

WOT’s algorithm

67%

Child Safety

70%

What does the community say?

Share your feedback and help the communityReviews must consist of at least 15 charactersChoose the tags that best describe this website

Malware or Viruses

Poor customer service

Phishing

Scam

Potentially illegal

Misleading or unethical

Privacy Risk

Suspicious

Hate, discrimination

Spam

Potential unwanted program

Ads / Pop-ups

Adult Content

Incidental nudity

Gruesome or shocking

Cancel

Post Review

3.4

Based on 8 reviews

Sort by:

Newest

bkebke

7 years ago

this person is a right wing nut, presenting unsubstantiated claims and opinions as scientific facts.

Helpful

hypercleats

10 years ago

A misinformation campaign funded by the energy industry to advance their profit goals through FUD and lies.

Helpful

johnrael

12 years ago

Junkscience is either a very coincidental or ironic name. I can't decide which, but this website is FULL of junk science.

-Saad-

12 years ago

Full of pseudoscience.

Task99

12 years ago

The website's name is fitting: Junk Science. That's all this site is filled with.

Mike Barnard

13 years ago

The Junk Science blog lives up to its name. It publishes any junk science that agrees with its assumptions that global warming is a fraud and renewable energy is a scam. In one of its articles, it approvingly cites an unpeer-reviewed study by a retired guy (why are all the anti-renewable cranks retired) named Lepair. Mr. Lepair claims that wind turbines actually increase CO2 emissions based on incredibly bad and simplistic assumptions. Accepting his paper as worthy of promoting requires not only holding one's nose, but ignoring that it is not peer reviewed and is kind of dumb to boot. In other words, junk science. ***** The Junk Science blog is just that. It is a source of climate change and renewables disinformation. Any posts or citations should be considered to be highly suspect. Treat them as academic toxic waste.

Site-rater

14 years ago

Not only is the website itself junk science, but there are pharmaceutical advertisements on the side of the page.

Jared Gray

15 years ago

Hello All, These are some sites that present the other side of the global warming argument.. That it is essentially a big scam etc..

Check If You’ve Been CompromisedConnect with Google to scan your browsing history.

Connect with Google

As seen on

By signing in, you agree to data collection and use as described in our Terms Of Use and Privacy Policy

About WOT

We reviewed more than 2 Million website and counting. WOT is a lightweight extension designed to help you browse quickly and securely. It will clean your browser, speed it up, and protect your private information.