principia-scientific.orgは安全ですか?

疑わしいウェブサイト

ウェブサイトのセキュリティスコア

49%
WOT のセキュリティ スコアは、当社独自のテクノロジーとコミュニティの専門家によるレビューに基づいています。
このウェブサイトは申請済みですか?
いいえ
コミュニティレビュー
★ 2.9
WOTのアルゴリズム
58%
子供の安全性
該当なし

コミュニティは何と言っていますか?

レビューを残す

このウェブサイトを1から5の間で、どのように評価しますか?
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
フィードバックを共有してコミュニティに貢献しましょうレビューは少なくとも15文字で構成されている必要がありますこのウェブサイトを最もよく表すタグを選択してください
マルウェアあるいはウイルス
顧客サービスが悪い
フィッシング
詐欺
違法の可能性がある
誤解を招くあるいは倫理に反している
プライバシーリスク
不審
憎悪、差別的
スパム
潜在的に迷惑なプログラム
広告/ポップアップ
アダルトコンテンツ
卑猥な可能性がある
残酷あるいは刺激的
キャンセル
レビューの投稿
2.9
starstarstarempty-starempty-star

30のレビューに基づく

並び順:
最新
This site is a source of pseudoscience, conspiracy and is not a valid source of scientific information. This site is owned by John O'Sulivan who for years has been passing himself off as a renowned attorney license to practice in New York State and elsewhere. O'Sulivan is an ex-art and gym teacher who was fired after being arrested for sexual misconduct with an underage girl. See: *****
役立つ
Site is Safe, Content is scientific in nature. No viruses detected when scanned with AVG Premium.
役立つ
The fact that so many left wing media outlets and "climate science" adherents slam this site pretty much tells you all you need to know. The left simply doesn't understand that being critical of speculative theory and pointing out fallacies in logic, data, and statistics doesn't mean that anyone is a "denier" but that people can and do have the right to rational discussion and do have the right to express opinion and research findings regardless of it departing from the pseudo-science know as "climate science" masquerading as proven science.
役立つ
I am a fan. Going against the money, control, media machine narrative takes courage and will not win the favour of the government's backhander crew or the sheep as you will ascertain from reading other reviews. This website has a different opinion, shows another side to things "They" don't want you to know the truth or the illusion to be shattered. Do your own research but not on igloogle, too frosty.
役立つ
Just another site for climate deniers, this time to gather money from people as well as "peer-review" their works in their own midst in an attempt to make themselves more credible. Stay away from this site.
1
Pseudo-science's premier outpost. Whack jobs only.
1
This web site is run by John O'Sulivan who for years has been passing himself off as a renowned attorney license to practice in New York State and elsewhere. O'Sulivan is an ex-art and gym teacher who was fired after being arrested for sexual misconduct with an underage girl. Though the court didn't convict him, he could not return to teaching. So he tried to become an author by self-publishing "auto-biographical" fiction, like this one: "Vanilla Girl: A fact-based crime story of a teacher's struggle to control his erotic obsession with a schoolgirl." where he describes his arrest and trial and offers a defense of adults who choose to have sex with children - which he refers to as "kiddyfiddling." Contrary to his many self-promotional assertions, O'Sulivan has no law degree. He is has never been licensed to practice law. Although he claims extensive knowledge of climatology, physics, and other scientific disciplines, he has no formal training, experience, or legitimate credentials. Although he continues to self-publish his "scientific" and "legal" opinions, he has never published work in a peer-reviewed journal. This above statements are based on research and reporting I've done over the past 6 years. I am a semi-retired investigative science and medical journalist and for a decade was an associate news editor for the Journal of the American Medical Association. These statements are documented in an affidavit I was asked to prepare by noted Canadian attorney Roger McConchie, who is representing climatologist Michael Mann in his libel suit against O'Sullivan's global warming denying associate Tim Ball. The affidavits can be downloaded here: ***** *****
2
Web of Censorship is now what used to be WoT. Disgusting.
役立つ
Left-wing environmentalists who believe in non-science AGW are deliberately downgrading this site because it produces scientific research contrary to what these global warming alarmists believe in. Seems to be an orchestrated approach by activists to categorize any legitimate, climate science research site as "misleading claims or unethical"
役立つ
This site is less of a science website and more of a promotional site for misinformation. You might disagree that gravity exists but it doesn't make you right.
1
Apologists will always have something to say to stay conformist
役立つ
There is nothing untrustworthy or otherwise malevolent about this site. If it disagrees with the narrative put forward by the "degrowther" movement and the willing sheeple that subscribe to it, too bad. Stick with the so-called consensus being pushed by scientists, most of whom receive funding directly to prove/promote the concept that a tiny fraction of a tiny fraction of the earth's atmosphere is somehow contributing to catastrophic climate change but do not suppress informed and intellectual debate.
役立つ
Pseudoscience at best, but really more anti-science in it's ideology. Blatantly distorts and lies about climate science and scientists.
1
Any site that disputes the supposed "consensus" on climate change is denigrated and voted down on WOT by the climate alarmist zealots. This site is a good alternative to the drumbeat supporting faulty science
役立つ
Once again the liberal retards are rating a conservative site as untrustworthy. When will the lies end??!!
役立つ
A mundane anti-vaccination, climate science denial site. Nothing worth reading here. For background, see: <http://www.desmogblog.com/principia-scientific-international>.
役立つ
Seems the bad ratings aren't a result of any malware or scamming, but rather the reaction of those that would choose to silence dissent regarding climate change by whatever means necessary. If the science is so convincing, why the fear of another opinion?
役立つ
Verifiable science, links for verification, balanced coverage of topic.
役立つ
Excellent, honest, effort to make Climate Understandable, using scientific facts. Sadly, the extreme left of politics, hates the truth and this website.
役立つ
The site is clean. Informative and encourages debate. Sites should not be red-rated based on prejudices. There is an increasing trend for some pro-wind and pro-AGM's to red-rate every site that presents the other side of the story. This is not what WOT should be used for, to stifle debate and discouraging users to stay away from clean sites in case alternative facts are shared.
1
12
侵害されていないか確認するGoogle に接続して閲覧履歴をスキャンします。
Google と接続
掲載されているもの
サインインすることで、当社の定めるデータ収集と使用に同意したことになります。 利用規約 及び 個人情報保護方針
alternative-placeholder

WOT について

私たちは 200 万以上のウェブサイトをレビューしました。 WOT は、迅速かつ安全にブラウジングできるように設計された軽量拡張機能です。 ブラウザをクリーンアップし、速度を上げ、個人情報を保護します。

これはあなたのウェブサイトですか?

ウェブサイトを申請して、WOT のビジネス ツールにアクセスし、顧客とつながりましょう。
このウェブサイトを連携する
このサイトでは分析とパーソナライズのために Cookie を使用しています。 続行すると、当社の クッキーポリシー。
受け入れる