Безопасен ли thegwpf.com?

Anything that questions "accepted and settled science" is a very good thing. But that is not what the proponents of climate alarmism want, so they down vote sites like this everywhere, including WOT ratings. This is not acceptable, and WOT should reset ratings for this site (if they are able to).

Appears to be the site for the "Global Warming Policy Forum", a for-profit limited company confusingly with the same initials as its parent "Global Warming Policy Foundation" that has a site at hxxp://www.thegwpf.org/. Both .org and .com domains were registered by Benny Peiser in 2009, although the "Forum" was not incorporated as a limited company until ***** The same caveats about bias and untrustworthy presentation apply as discussed at ***** This is even more the case for the .com because as a trading arm the so-called "Forum" is not directly governed by UK charity law and so is relatively free to campaign for things which are not charitable causes. For explanation, see ***** It appears that much of the "sceptical" or contrarian content has already moved to the non-charitable .com site. IMHO, the title of the company is misleading since it it is not an open "forum" and seems to have no activity about global warming policy, whether mitigation or adaptation. The policy debate is elsewhere.

They are the defacto lobby group for enlightenment scientists. The UNIPCC lobby group (Appendix E, point 3, read it) along with the Sierra Club are abusing their powers to make us think the planet is warming, when it is not. This website uses science and questions the UNIPCC's assumptions, so to see this website with a negative score only shows how creatively vindictive "religious people" are in the face of science and reason. Therefore I'd put this as a safe site, although I expect many well paid people will be voting otherwise.